Hotel Edison, New York City, Decent

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » New York » New York Destinations » New York Hotels » Hotel Edison

OpinionWell
Rank

111th

Out of 676

Hotel Edison	Average Price: $316 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

228 West 47TH Street

New York City, 10036 View map

3-Star Hotel Rank: 36 of 154
Average review rating: 3.67

OpinionWell Value Index: 3

Traveler reviews analyzed: BedBugRegistry (51) , Expedia (93) , MyTravelGuide (1) , TripAdvisor (1135) , YahooTravel (83)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (4/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	There are recent comments about Construction, Renovation.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	Recent comments complained about room smell.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	Recent comments complained about bed bugs.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

acceptable (25) adequate (47) affordable (47) beautiful (41) best (156) better (161) big (104) brilliant (47) cares (62) cheaper (26) clean (729) comfortable (276) comfy (40) convenient (84) cool (27) courteous (40) decent (53) efficient (41) excellent (168) exceptional (36) fabulous (32) fantastic (105) fast (27) free (81) fresh (42) friendly (462) fun (22) good (551) great (751) happy (59) helpful (378) huge (51) liked (274) love (130) new (541) nice (286) perfect (172) perfectly (27) pleasant (57) pleased (32) plenty (88) positive (30) professional (29) quiet (68) reasonable (89) reasonably (40) spacious (48) superb (27) welcoming (40) wonderful (92)

Decent

Appears in 52 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Decent:
bathroom (11) bed (9) breakfast (4) bug (4) clean (10) food (4) good (5) great (6) hotel (17) location (11) much (3) night (5) not (3) perfect (4) price (17) reviews (4) room (29) size (12) staff (3) well (3)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. The room was clean and decent size as was the bathroom.

"Location location location! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/23/2012 Vote

2. Some reviews commented on the lack of decent views from their window, and I agree, although we were able to see some of the billboards in Times Square, however as a base to sightsee around New York, this brought my review for the Edison Hotel up to 3 stars or average.

"excellent location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/19/2012 Vote

3. On saying that the room was decent size, bathroom small but perfect.

"would return to this hotel " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/1/2012 Vote

4. We stayed at the Edison for 4 nights, middle Feb 2012 and it was a decent hotel.

"A well deserved 3 star Hotel " Read full review on TripAdvisor 2/28/2012 Vote

5. Great location and decent bar.

"Great deal for the $$ " Read full review on TripAdvisor 2/24/2012 Vote

6. The hotel is old, but clean and well maintained with small bathrooms, comfortable beds and very decent prices.

"Best value and location in Times Square " Read full review on TripAdvisor 2/14/2012 Vote

7. It is a hotel at one of the best locations, well kept, very safe, very friendly staff, decent rooms, clean bathrooms and with all the amenities.

"Treasure on Times Square " Read full review on TripAdvisor 2/12/2012 Vote

8. decent prices at an amazing location, no deals like that.

"Great Value " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/19/2012 Vote

9. If you're looking for a place to crash in the evening and have a decent night sleep this is the perfect hotel for you.

"Great Value " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/19/2012 Vote

10. I would recommend it if you are looking for a decent place to stay, great location and not a ton of money.

"Not the Taj Mahal but a great value, great location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/17/2012 Vote