Hotel Nikko San Francisco, San Francisco, Good

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » California » San Francisco Destinations » San Francisco Hotels » Hotel Nikko San Francisco

OpinionWell
Rank

3rd

Out of 493

Hotel Nikko San Francisco	Average Price: $307 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

222 Mason Street

San Francisco, 94102 View map

4-Star Hotel Rank: 2 of 37
Average review rating: 3.85

OpinionWell Value Index: 5

Traveler reviews analyzed: BedBugRegistry (4) , Expedia (77) , MyTravelGuide (181) , Travelocity (61) , TripAdvisor (712) , YahooTravel (30)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (2/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	Recent comments complained about parking fees.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

accommodating (24) attentive (14) awesome (20) beautiful (51) best (56) better (65) big (49) cares (19) clean (255) comfortable (181) comfy (16) convenient (49) courteous (23) decent (22) delicious (17) efficient (37) elegant (16) excellent (127) exceptional (25) fabulous (24) fantastic (41) fast (17) free (116) fresh (16) friendly (154) good (286) great (462) happy (38) helpful (162) huge (44) liked (119) love (76) new (44) nice (302) outstanding (14) perfect (49) perfectly (14) pleasant (29) pleased (17) plenty (26) positive (16) professional (28) quiet (72) reasonable (34) reasonably (15) spacious (57) spotless (17) superb (12) welcoming (27) wonderful (79)

Good	Appears in 445 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Good:
area (23) bed (25) breakfast (25) clean (33) excellent (18) food (26) great (25) hotel (126) location (91) nice (39) not (50) price (20) recommend (18) room (106) service (52) shop (33) size (21) staff (27) value (19) walking (20)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. Breakfast is delicious, huge choice and good quality.

"Expensive but very convenient " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/22/2012 Vote

2. If you are looking for a good place to stay in San Fransico you won't be disappointed with the Hotel Nikko.

"Great for Girls Vacation " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/22/2012 Vote

3. We good walk to shopping, the cable cars, the ferry building and the piers.

"Great for Girls Vacation " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/22/2012 Vote

4. We managed to get a pretty good deal using Otel.

"Enjoyable stay! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/21/2012 Vote

5. We also felt the service was very good and friendly; particularly the help desk to assist with any questions on getting around or restaurant suggestions.

"Enjoyable stay! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/21/2012 Vote

6. The good:I stayed at the Hotel Nikko for a convention at the Moscone.

"Very nice hotel " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/16/2012 Vote

7. The rooms are a good size - my only negative point was the lack of a bedside lamp or switch to turn off the main light which meant I had to go back to the entrance to turn the light off and walk back to bed in the dark - a little odd.

"Great Location, Good service " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/13/2012 Vote

8. The buffet breakfast is excellent with a huge choice and the service was also very good.

"Great Location, Good service " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/13/2012 Vote

9. The bed was very comfortable and they provided plenty of tolitries and even a good hairdryer.

"Fantastic! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/6/2012 Vote

10. I think the Jap restaurant serves good food too, though I have not visited.

"Perfect Location, Value for money " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/30/2012 Vote