Club Quarters Chicago, Chicago, Adequate

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » Illinois » Chicago Destinations » Chicago Hotels » Club Quarters Chicago

OpinionWell
Rank

40th

Out of 415

Club Quarters Chicago	Average Price: $179 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

111 West Adams Street

Chicago, 60603 View map

3-Star Hotel Rank: 15 of 73
Average review rating: 3.91

OpinionWell Value Index: 9

Traveler reviews analyzed: BedBugRegistry (8) , Expedia (143) , MyTravelGuide (1759) , Travelocity (36) , TripAdvisor (406) , YahooTravel (43)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (1/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

accommodating (12) adequate (23) awesome (12) beautiful (11) best (24) better (31) big (39) cares (11) cheaper (9) clean (269) cleanliness (11) comfortable (130) comfy (15) convenient (68) cool (12) cozy (8) decent (33) efficient (30) excellent (66) exceptional (14) fast (21) free (173) fresh (12) friendly (115) good (231) great (283) happy (17) helpful (114) huge (14) liked (105) love (15) magnificent (23) new (29) nice (208) perfect (60) perfectly (9) pleasant (25) plenty (36) professional (14) quiet (67) reasonable (40) reasonably (10) responsive (8) secure (13) spacious (21) spotless (10) superb (9) welcoming (8) well appointed (8) wonderful (21)

Adequate

Appears in 75 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Adequate:
bathroom (4) bed (4) busy (6) chair (3) clean (15) comfortable (5) couple (3) friendly (3) good (3) hotel (18) much (3) need (3) not (13) perfect (5) personable (5) room (57) service (3) size (9) small (33) standard (3)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. While the room was small and tight, it was clean, updated and adequate.

"Good value, great location. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/18/2012 Vote

2. As mentioned above, I also attended a seminar in the hotel and found the conference rooms to be on the small side, but adequate for the intended purpose.

"Comfortable, clean, and great location! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/29/2012 Vote

3. Small but adequate fitness room also, and cold water on bottles at the elevator is nice.

"Good value for money " Read full review on TripAdvisor 11/13/2011 Vote

4. The room was clean and adequate for what we needed.

"Nice no frills hotel " Read full review on TripAdvisor 10/24/2011 Vote

5. The room and bathroom were adequately clean but made me decide to take all of our meals off property.

"Dorm Room " Read full review on TripAdvisor 10/10/2011 Vote

6. Restaurant was adequate.

"Adequate " Read full review on TripAdvisor 10/5/2011 Vote

7. I was also very impressed with the business-friendly conditions: computers linked free to printers; free wi-fi throughout the hotel; adjacent English pub/restaurant with reasonable service and adequate menu offering.

"Loved the Jr. Suite, but had to move from the basic room (simply too small) " Read full review on TripAdvisor 8/3/2011 Vote

8. Found the rooms small, but certainly adequate for a solo traveler.

"Nice hotel " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/3/2011 Vote

9. The room I had was quite small for American standards, but I found it perfectly adequate for my needs (I declined the upgrade to a suite for $25/day).

"Cozy and cheap - good for solo business travelers " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/24/2011 Vote

10. The room was not large, but was adequate.

"Highly Recommend for Many Reasons " Read full review on TripAdvisor 2/20/2011 Vote