The Hotel at Times Square, New York City, Cleanliness

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » New York » New York Destinations » New York Hotels » The Hotel at Times Square

OpinionWell
Rank

70th

Out of 676

The Hotel at Times Square	Average Price: $259 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

59 West 46th Street

New York City, 10036 View map

2-Star Hotel Rank: 8 of 144
Average review rating: 2.91

OpinionWell Value Index: 6

Traveler reviews analyzed: MyTravelGuide (12) , TripAdvisor (520) , YahooTravel (58)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (3/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	There are recent comments about Construction.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	Recent comments complained about room smell.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

accommodating (15) adequate (31) affordable (23) awesome (15) beautiful (11) best (57) better (54) big (54) cares (21) cheaper (14) clean (386) cleanliness (15) comfortable (156) comfy (22) convenient (61) cool (12) decent (38) efficient (17) excellent (81) exceptional (24) fancy (13) fantastic (33) fast (15) free (245) fresh (35) friendly (219) good (345) great (426) happy (24) helpful (173) huge (32) impressed (17) liked (113) love (37) new (220) nice (243) perfect (71) perfectly (14) pleasant (36) pleased (29) plenty (58) positive (17) quiet (83) reasonable (56) reasonably (23) spacious (46) spotless (11) superb (14) welcoming (14) wonderful (27)

Cleanliness

Appears in 15 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Cleanliness:
basic (2) bathroom (2) bed (3) breakfast (2) clean (2) comfortable (2) free (2) good (2) great (2) hotel (6) impressed (2) location (2) not (2) please (2) room (10) size (3) small (2)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. We choose this hotel based on all the good reviews from trip advisor, but we were very surprise to find out all those cleanliness issues.

"Strong Odor in the bathroom " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/16/2012 Vote

2. The rooms had everything we needed cleanliness, comfy beds, quiet and an easy basic but fresh self-serve breakfast.

"Week-end stay " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/29/2012 Vote

3. cleanliness - rooms quite clean.

"Great location, great value, breakfast included. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 2/23/2012 Vote

4. This hotel has very small rooms, but the attention to detail in the cleanliness was appreciated.

"Cozy, clean, value " Read full review on TripAdvisor 11/8/2011 Vote

5. The bathroom was clean, small, but cleanliness is more important than the size so I'm not complaining.

"Affordable for Times Square " Read full review on TripAdvisor 9/24/2011 Vote

6. When I go to NYC I expect a tiny room, and am mostly focused on cleanliness and location.

"Would Return " Read full review on TripAdvisor 7/4/2011 Vote

7. We have also stayed at another of the hotels, the Ramada Inn East Side, and were very pleased with the value and cleanliness of both.

"Great location, great value " Read full review on TripAdvisor 6/19/2011 Vote

8. We were impressed with the excellent standard of service, general cleanliness and room facilities.

"Does Exactly What You Expect and Good Location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 10/21/2010 Vote

9. The 6 other women and I were pleased by the cleanliness of this hotel.

"Very Pleased " Read full review on TripAdvisor 6/30/2010 Vote

10. I was very impressed with the cleanliness of this hotel: the room and hallways were in good repair; the bathroom was immaculate and equipped with nice basics.

"Excellent for a single traveler who just needs a good night's sleep " Read full review on TripAdvisor 6/11/2010 Vote