Hotel Blake Chicago, Chicago, Comfortable

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » Illinois » Chicago Destinations » Chicago Hotels » Hotel Blake Chicago

OpinionWell
Rank

53rd

Out of 415

Hotel Blake Chicago	Average Price: $241 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

500 South Dearborn Street

Chicago, 60605 View map

3-Star Hotel Rank: 19 of 73
Average review rating: 3.66

OpinionWell Value Index: 6

Traveler reviews analyzed: BedBugRegistry (2) , Expedia (50) , MyTravelGuide (11) , Travelocity (8) , TripAdvisor (432) , YahooTravel (36)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (1/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

accommodating (18) awesome (16) beautiful (36) best (44) better (42) big (50) cares (22) clean (153) cleanliness (9) comfortable (146) comfy (20) convenient (51) cool (17) courteous (22) cozy (9) decent (17) excellent (72) exceptional (21) fabulous (9) fantastic (15) fast (11) free (102) fresh (11) friendly (174) fun (17) generous (9) good (164) great (265) happy (24) helpful (171) huge (44) liked (107) love (45) luxurious (10) magnificent (18) new (35) nice (230) perfect (30) pleasant (23) pleased (16) plenty (12) positive (14) professional (14) quiet (42) reasonable (37) spacious (60) tasteful (10) welcoming (25) well appointed (11) wonderful (47)

Comfortable

Appears in 183 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Comfortable:
bathroom (18) beauty (7) bed (100) clean (28) decorate (10) friendly (11) great (17) hotel (39) large (23) location (8) most (14) nice (22) not (12) pillow (9) room (101) service (8) shower (12) size (15) spacious (18) staff (17)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. This is nice boutique type hotel - very friendly staff and comfortable beds.

"Small Personable Hotel, But A Bit Out of the Way from the Action " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/19/2012 Vote

2. We found the room very comfortable.

"Great hotel in a great location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/13/2012 Vote

3. Enjoy a clean comfortable stay.

"Great clean comfortable " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/13/2012 Vote

4. It was a nice size with a comfortable bed and spacious bathroom.

"Very enjoyable " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/11/2012 Vote

5. The room was clean and the bed extremely comfortable.

"Great place to stay! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/9/2012 Vote

6. The beds are very comfortable and the staff is welcoming, polite and exceptionally personable and helpful.

"Centrally located and affordable " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/23/2012 Vote

7. The room was very large and the King size beds where probably the most comfortable beds I have ever slept in in a hotel.

"Spacious room and great beds - but very noisy " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/19/2012 Vote

8. My room was furnished with a king size bed, a wall-mounted flat screen, and comfortable chairs.

"Don't spend a fortune in the financial district " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/28/2012 Vote

9. The Wyndham Blake is located in what appears to be a restored building and has retained many older features while providing a comfortable hotel experience.

"Don't spend a fortune in the financial district " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/28/2012 Vote

10. All in all one of the most comfortable places I stayed in for a couple of days and for the price, there was no other place I would have preferred to stay.

"Used to be Hotel Blake " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/17/2012 Vote