Homewood Suites Houston, Houston, Disappoint

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » Texas » Houston Destinations » Houston Hotels » Homewood Suites Houston

OpinionWell
Rank

58th

Out of 718

Homewood Suites Houston	Average Price: $181 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

2950 Sage Road

Houston, 77056 View map

3-Star Hotel Rank: 28 of 121
Average review rating: 3.81

OpinionWell Value Index: 1

Traveler reviews analyzed: Expedia (4) , Travelocity (2) , TripAdvisor (65)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (0/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	No recent comments about noise were found.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

annoy (1) bad (2) big deal (1) broken (6) chipped (1) complain (1) complaint (2) cramped (3) damage (2) difficult (2) disappoint (2) downside (1) expensive (1) frustrated (1) hard (3) hate (1) inconvenient (1) issue (6) lacking (1) noise (4) problem (3) slow (4) smell (4) unfortunate (2)

Disappoint

Appears in 2 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Disappoint:

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

1. For the price ($109 for King studio suite) I don't think you will be disappointed - especially given the much higher cost of nearby options.

"Great Christmas! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 12/31/2008 Vote

2. I was disappointed that the channel line up did not include HGTV, but then I don`t know which hotels do have HGTV.

"Homewood Suites provide the best of Suite Worlds! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 6/22/2007 Vote