OpinionWell's Blog
Home
»
United States
»
California
»
San Francisco Destinations
»
San Francisco Hotels
»
Cathedral Hill Hotel San Francisco
Back to search results
OpinionWell
Rank
129th
Out of 493
Cathedral Hill Hotel San Francisco
Average Price: $365
Check Rates
Hotel Class:
1101 Van Ness Avenue
San Francisco, 94109
View map
3-Star Hotel Rank:
57 of 110
Average review rating:
2.96
OpinionWell Value Index:
2
Traveler reviews analyzed:
Expedia
(
60
)
,
Travelocity
(
26
)
,
TripAdvisor
(
226
)
,
YahooTravel
(
31
)
SAFE TO BOOK ?
(2/5 issues found)
Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:
Construction:
No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:
Recent comments
complained about noise.
Room Smell:
Recent comments
complained about room smell.
Parking Fees:
No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:
No recent comments about bed bugs were found.
Search reviews for other problems
Keyword Cloud
The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.
All
Positive
Negative
Keyword Search
avoid
(10)
awful
(6)
bad
(22)
bare
(3)
broken
(9)
complain
(9)
complaint
(5)
dated
(17)
difficult
(5)
dingy
(3)
dirt
(3)
dirty
(33)
disappoint
(13)
dump
(3)
expensive
(12)
filthy
(7)
hard
(15)
horrible
(5)
issue
(10)
lack
(3)
loud
(9)
mold
(2)
negative
(4)
noise
(31)
noisy
(12)
outdated
(7)
overpriced
(4)
peeling
(12)
poor
(7)
pricey
(3)
problem
(11)
rough
(3)
rude
(9)
sadly
(3)
scary
(4)
shabby
(5)
slow
(5)
smell
(18)
smelly
(3)
snooty
(3)
tear
(4)
terrible
(8)
threadbare
(3)
tiny
(3)
uncomfortable
(4)
unfortunate
(3)
unfriendly
(3)
worn
(7)
worst
(9)
wrong
(10)
See more
Worn
Appears in 9 comments.
The following words were used in comments with
Worn:
carpet
(4)
dirty
(2)
furniture
(2)
hotel
(4)
old
(3)
pleasant
(2)
well
(2)
Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the
Most helpful
section.
Sort by:
Date
Votes
1.
The outside of the hotel was 1960's style and rather
worn
looking.
"Hotel review "
Read full review
on
Travelocity
8/1/2009
Vote
2.
However, the hotel is very, very old and the walls and carpet were very dirty and
worn
.
"Very old, hot and dirty walls and carpet. "
Read full review
on
Expedia
4/28/2009
Vote
3.
The linens were
worn
and all the fixtures were old and
worn
.
"Only if you cannot find somewhere else "
Read full review
on
TripAdvisor
8/26/2008
Vote
4.
The furniture was a bit
worn
out and the curtains could have done with a wash.
"Would not be my choice to stay in again if I return to San Fransisco "
Read full review
on
TripAdvisor
2/5/2008
Vote
5.
The hotel is definietley
worn
, but everyone we came into contact with was very pleasant.
"OK for the Priceline price - "
Read full review
on
TripAdvisor
10/10/2007
Vote
6.
The hotel room had a pleasant view overlooking the main street , was very dated with
worn
carpets but was generally clean.
"Convenient "
Read full review
on
TripAdvisor
7/15/2007
Vote
7.
The carpets seemed very well
worn
and the stains seemed old.
"It didn`t cost much and it shows "
Read full review
on
TripAdvisor
2/28/2006
Vote
8.
The lights came on to reveal cheap, scratched furniture with cigarette burns,
worn
and dirty carpet that was well overdue for replacement, and a rock-hard bed with a
worn
bedspread.
"A Priceline disaster "
Read full review
on
TripAdvisor
9/11/2005
Vote
9.
The place basically needs a face-lift, it looks a little
worn
around the edges.
"Somewhat disappointed "
Read full review
on
TripAdvisor
8/5/2004
Vote
About Us
|
Terms of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Site Map
Tools for hotel professionals
© 2010 OpinionWell, LLC, All Rights Reserved