Sands Regency Hotel and Casino, Reno, Terrible

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » Nevada » Reno Hotels » Sands Regency Hotel and Casino

OpinionWell
Rank

5th

Out of 158

Sands Regency Hotel and Casino	Average Daily Rate: NA Check Rates

Hotel Class:

345 North Arlington Avenue

Reno, 89501 View map

3-Star Hotel Rank: 3 of 20
Average review rating: 3.56

OpinionWell Value Index: NA

Traveler reviews analyzed: BedBugRegistry (4) , Expedia (158) , MyTravelGuide (382) , YahooTravel (71)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (0/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	No recent comments about noise were found.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

annoy (1) avoid (3) bad (8) barely (2) bed bugs (12) bugs (3) complaint (9) dated (2) difficult (3) dingy (2) dirty (4) disappoint (5) disturbing (2) dull (1) dump (1) expensive (1) filthy (2) hard (13) horrible (6) issue (5) loud (2) mildew (2) noise (6) noisy (7) poor (4) poorly (2) problem (14) roach (1) rock (6) rude (5) sad (1) slow (6) smell (12) stain (1) stale (1) stink (1) stunk (1) tacky (1) terrible (5) tiny (1) ugly (2) uncomfortable (4) unhappy (1) unpleasant (2) unsafe (1) urine (1) was a joke (1) worn (2) worst (2) wrong (4)

Terrible

Appears in 15 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Terrible:
alarm (2) atmosphere (2) cable (2) good (3) hotel (5) luggage (2) noisy (2) not (3) room (3) sleep (2) staff (3)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. I like the idea of it being "terribles sands regency," because it adds a lot of character to the hotel.

"It was okay. " Read full review on Expedia 3/5/2010 Vote

2. Really suggest dropping the "terrible's" from the hotel name and pitch.

"You get what you pay for. " Read full review on Expedia 2/3/2010 Vote

3. The downsides, the beds were terribly uncomfortable and I was incredibly disappointed with the buffet.

"You get what you pay for " Read full review on Expedia 12/23/2009 Vote

4. The service was terrible and the atmosphere wasn't pleasant at all.

"Terrible " Read full review on Expedia 12/16/2009 Vote

5. The only thing I didn't personally care for was: The terrible smell of cigarette smoke when you enter the casino to check in.

"Great place to stay for the price! " Read full review on Expedia 10/2/2009 Vote

6. This is a casino, the main emphasis of the money spent here is for the casino, the hotel is not good and it is terrible walking into a smoky, smelly, noisy atmosphere when all you want to do is check in for your room.

Read full review on MyTravelGuide 10/10/2008 Vote

7. The hotel is a dump and the staff at the desk was terrible.

Read full review on MyTravelGuide 8/21/2008 Vote

8. It's in a terrible location.

Read full review on MyTravelGuide 8/21/2008 Vote

9. There food was terrible.

Read full review on MyTravelGuide 5/28/2008 Vote

10. The cable also went out for the good part of a day while we were there, not to mention the cable package is terrible.

"How bad can bad be? " Read full review on YahooTravel 5/19/2008 Vote