Sands Regency Hotel and Casino, Reno, Problem

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » Nevada » Reno Hotels » Sands Regency Hotel and Casino

OpinionWell
Rank

5th

Out of 158

Sands Regency Hotel and Casino	Average Daily Rate: NA Check Rates

Hotel Class:

345 North Arlington Avenue

Reno, 89501 View map

3-Star Hotel Rank: 3 of 20
Average review rating: 3.56

OpinionWell Value Index: NA

Traveler reviews analyzed: BedBugRegistry (4) , Expedia (158) , MyTravelGuide (382) , YahooTravel (71)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (0/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	No recent comments about noise were found.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

annoy (1) avoid (3) bad (8) barely (2) bed bugs (12) bugs (3) complaint (9) dated (2) difficult (3) dingy (2) dirty (4) disappoint (5) disturbing (2) dull (1) dump (1) expensive (1) filthy (2) hard (13) horrible (6) issue (5) loud (2) mildew (2) noise (6) noisy (7) poor (4) poorly (2) problem (14) roach (1) rock (6) rude (5) sad (1) slow (6) smell (12) stain (1) stale (1) stink (1) stunk (1) tacky (1) terrible (5) tiny (1) ugly (2) uncomfortable (4) unhappy (1) unpleasant (2) unsafe (1) urine (1) was a joke (1) worn (2) worst (2) wrong (4)

Problem

Appears in 27 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Problem:
bad (2) bed (4) cares (2) customer (3) desk (2) game (2) hot (2) hotel (7) ice (2) most (2) noise (2) not (4) older (3) room (4) shower (3) sleep (2) staff (2) waiter (2) water (4)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. Not the place to place to stay if you have respiratory problems or allergic asthma.

"Non-smoking room? " Read full review on Expedia 9/29/2010 Vote

2. But my biggest problem was related to my asthma, which is easily triggered by tobacco smoke.

"Non-smoking room? " Read full review on Expedia 9/29/2010 Vote

3. The only problem we had was the maintenance they were loud in between the hall way chatting up a storm while we were still sleeping and even when we had the sign do not distrub the house keeper keep knocking on my door not just once but 3 times.

"cant wait to go back " Read full review on Expedia 9/7/2010 Vote

4. They knew they have a bed bug problem but instead of dealing with the issue they decided to lie to the customers.

Read full review 3/17/2010 Vote

5. Hotel is older/not luxurious and attracts a younger crowd but the rooms ARE huge and I for one had no noise problems over the course of 2 nights.

"Perhaps fewer stars, but GREAT deal! " Read full review on Expedia 10/14/2009 Vote

6. We were on the 8th floor, it shouldn't have had plumbing problems at that level.

"Not all bad... " Read full review on YahooTravel 9/29/2009 Vote

7. The only problem I had with the hotel was their policy of charging extra for a crib in the room and it was tiny my 18 month old child had to sleep in the bed with me because the crib was so small.

"The cleanest hotel I have ever stayed in " Read full review on Expedia 8/26/2009 Vote

8. Apart from the bed problems everything was great, except for some shower and pipe problems.

"Cheap, but enough to get you a a good stay for a week " Read full review on Expedia 4/3/2009 Vote

9. I never had any problems with either the sheets or towels, like I have had with other hotels in Reno.

"Best value " Read full review on Expedia 4/2/2009 Vote

10. The only problems we had were long lines waiting for check-in when they had about 5 workers but only 1 helping with check-in the line was a good 20 people or more.

"We will continue to stay there on our yearly trip " Read full review on Expedia 4/2/2009 Vote