Hampton Inn Washington Dc, Washington DC, Amenity

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » » Washington DC Destinations » Washington DC Hotels » Hampton Inn Washington Dc

OpinionWell
Rank

14th

Out of 279

Hampton Inn Washington Dc	Average Price: $236 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

901 6th Street NorthWest

Washington DC, 20001 View map

2-Star Hotel Rank: 1 of 21
Average review rating: 4.34

OpinionWell Value Index: 4

Traveler reviews analyzed: BedBugRegistry (3) , Expedia (55) , Travelocity (10) , TripAdvisor (365) , YahooTravel (4)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (1/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

amenity (16) bar (18) bathroom (46) bed (43) breakfast (405) charge (11) check in (46) check out (14) complimentary (35) concierge (18) cost (21) deal (9) dinner (29) downtown (20) fee (8) fitness center (10) food (65) front desk (64) gym (8) hot tub (34) hotel (775) housekeeping (17) laundry (10) lobby (51) location (228) lunch (8) manager (13) money (24) neighborhood (26) parking (71) pillow (22) pool (119) price (62) rate (43) recommend (65) restaurant (127) room (543) service (76) shower (15) staff (286) street (81) suite (22) to park (9) towel (13) valet (27) valet parking (33) value (28) view (40) walk (202) wireless (32)

Amenity

Appears in 16 comments.

100% wrote positive comments about amenity

The following words were used in comments with Amenity:
comfortable (2) expectation (3) good (2) high (2) hotel (6) location (2) nice (3) pleasant (2) pool (3) price (3)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. Comfortable beds and good bathroom amenities.

"Good for family visit " Read full review on TripAdvisor 10/17/2011 Vote

2. The room had the standard Hampton Inn amenities, which are pretty good (small refrigerator, microwave oven).

"Location, location, and well, it's a Hampton Inn " Read full review on TripAdvisor 8/12/2011 Vote

3. So all in all a very pleasant stay with extremely helpful and resourceful staff, nice family amenities (indoor pool), with well maintained premises, very clean.

"Great stay " Read full review on TripAdvisor 8/7/2011 Vote

4. The beds are superb, and the amenities and condiments are perfectly adequate.

"Hampton Inn Washington, DC: A superb property! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 6/19/2011 Vote

5. -- it was the least expensive of the ones within walking distance to the mall, yet it was also very high quality with nice amenities such as a breakfast bar, swimming pool (very small), hot tub, and new furnishings (March 2009).

"Hampton Inn Chinatown " Read full review on Expedia 4/8/2009 Vote

6. The swimming pool and hot tub were a nice amenity to have after a long day of walking.

"Great place for a weekend away! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 7/28/2008 Vote

7. I found the staff pleasant and the amenities above average for the price.

"Good value and location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 12/28/2007 Vote

8. As far as Downtown as DC hotel prices go, for location and amenities, you can't beat this hotel.

"Perfect downtown stay for a decent DC price " Read full review on TripAdvisor 2/26/2012 Vote

9. Although this was not the cheapest venue I found, it had amenities that made up for it.

"Great Location and Accommodations " Read full review on TripAdvisor 11/12/2011 Vote

10. You don't really get any additional amenities for this.

"Good, safe location. Not so great shower. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 9/22/2011 Vote