Day Inn Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, Bathroom

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » California » Santa Barbara Destinations » Santa Barbara Hotels » Day Inn Santa Barbara

OpinionWell
Rank

36th

Out of 107

Day Inn Santa Barbara	Average Price: $126 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

116 Castillo Street

Santa Barbara, 93101 View map

2-Star Hotel Rank: 9 of 20
Average review rating: 2.84

OpinionWell Value Index: NA

Traveler reviews analyzed: Expedia (2) , Travelocity (3) , TripAdvisor (60) , YahooTravel (3)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (0/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	No recent comments about noise were found.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

amenity (2) bar (6) bath (1) bathroom (19) beach (19) bed (10) breakfast (21) cable (1) check in (8) check out (1) checkout (1) check-out (1) complimentary (1) cost (2) deal (2) decor (2) dinner (1) downtown (5) food (2) front desk (7) hot tub (2) hotel (39) housekeeping (1) lobby (5) location (20) manager (4) money (5) neighborhood (3) parking (12) pillow (2) pool (7) price (11) rate (3) recommend (5) restaurant (4) room (78) room service (1) service (2) shower (9) shuttle (1) staff (13) street (19) suite (2) towel (3) tub (4) value (3) walk (12) water pressure (1) waterfront (1) wireless (3)

Bathroom

Appears in 19 comments.

40% wrote positive comments about bathroom

The following words were used in comments with Bathroom:
clean (8) decent (2) driving (2) new (2) nice (2)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. There was a shower stall with varying water pressure and the bathroom was clean with plenty of towels, even though they were a little rough to the skin.

"Very pleased. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/8/2012 Vote

2. Nice bathroom.

"Good clean accommodation, rubbish breakfast " Read full review on TripAdvisor 8/12/2011 Vote

3. Could be a decent place again with some fresh paint, new furniture, bathroom refurbishment and some dual-pane windows.

"Great location, but in bad need of refurbishment " Read full review on TripAdvisor 7/15/2011 Vote

4. The carpet was frayed around the concrete walls and the bathroom albeit clean- was terribly uninviting.

"Hotel or Multistory Carpark? " Read full review on TripAdvisor 6/24/2011 Vote

5. Our room was very clean, the bathroom was new and the attention from the front desk was excellent.

"Perfect place to stay if you do no want to spend too much money " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/10/2009 Vote

6. The room was not huge or high fashion - but was absolutely spotless - including the bathroom.

"A Pleasant Surprise in a lovely city " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/2/2007 Vote

7. The tvs are old, the decor isn't something you'll want to buy, the bathroom could use an upgrade but it was close enough to the beach that I didn't have to drive down and find parking.

"Very Affordable No Frills in Ritzy City " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/21/2012 Vote

8. We book a room for three people and we got a suite: two bedrooms with one bathroom.

"Nice and cheap hotel in great location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/10/2012 Vote

9. 2 double beds, little bathroom area.

"good motel. would stay again " Read full review on TripAdvisor 10/22/2011 Vote

10. However, the room, although a decent size, looked a little grubby- sticky surfaces etc. Then when I went in the bathroom, there were hairs around the sink- clearly, the room had not been throughly cleaned.

"Not clean- we left after ten minutes. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 8/17/2011 Vote