Hampton Inn Austin, Austin, Suite

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » Texas » Austin Destinations » Austin Hotels » Hampton Inn Austin

OpinionWell
Rank

7th

Out of 287

Hampton Inn Austin	Average Price: $225 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

200 San Jacinto Boulevard

Austin, 78701 View map

3-Star Hotel Rank: 2 of 77
Average review rating: 4.12

OpinionWell Value Index: 4

Traveler reviews analyzed: BedBugRegistry (1) , Expedia (95) , TripAdvisor (169) , YahooTravel (9)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (0/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	No recent comments about noise were found.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

amenity (8) balcony (12) bar (29) bathroom (27) bed (39) breakfast (147) charge (8) check in (11) check out (8) checkout (5) complimentary (22) cost (16) deal (8) decor (4) dinner (7) discount (4) downtown (97) fee (7) food (18) front desk (49) hotel (335) housekeeping (18) lobby (26) location (168) manager (24) money (9) parking (56) pillow (17) pool (39) price (40) rate (21) recommend (28) restaurant (64) room (292) room service (12) service (57) shower (14) shuttle (4) staff (101) street (96) suite (39) to park (6) towel (17) tub (4) valet (41) valet parking (30) value (23) view (18) walk (56) wireless (13)

Suite

Appears in 39 comments.

87% wrote positive comments about suite

The following words were used in comments with Suite:
bad (2) breakfast (4) clean (2) downtown (3) expectation (3) floor (4) great (4) hotel (8) inn (9) large (4) nice (3) night (6)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. (this felt more like an Embassy Suites than a Hampton, except for the fact that there is no restaurant onsite) Scads of great places to eat within easy walking distance.

"All Hampton's Should Be Judged by This One " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/23/2012 Vote

2. Our King Suite was large & very accommodating.

"Perfect location. Close to venue! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/21/2012 Vote

3. They upgraded us to a suite--great room, bed, view--and informed us of complimentary happy hour (perfect fwith a great view and unwind before dinner on the balcony) and free breakfast, all benefits of Hilton Honors.

"Great Value, Location, Experience " Read full review on TripAdvisor 9/12/2011 Vote

4. We had a king suite which was nice with the couch and extra space, but the view was on the bad side of the building.

"A little let down... " Read full review on TripAdvisor 8/11/2011 Vote

5. Now quite the Embassy Suites breakfast, but definitely better than just a typical continental breakfast.

"Not worth the money! " Read full review on Expedia 8/24/2010 Vote

6. Stayed in the suite which was very spacious and great for relaxing having friends that we were traveling with come over for drinks before heading out on the town.

"Great location and good value " Read full review on TripAdvisor 7/31/2010 Vote

7. It was very clean and nicely set up for not being in a suite.

"Would stay here again " Read full review on Expedia 3/2/2010 Vote

8. Breakfast aren`t as good as the Embassy Suites, nor are the happy hours.

"Good hotel in Austin center " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/22/2008 Vote

9. Our room was big (we had a suite) and clean.

"First Class hotel! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 8/27/2007 Vote

10. We stayed here for an extended Memorial Weekend (4 nites) - couldn`t find fault with anything, except that the suite ( which we pd.

"Hampton was excellent, but Suites are misrepresented " Read full review on TripAdvisor 6/20/2007 Vote