Best Western Chicago, Chicago, Wireless

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » Illinois » Chicago Destinations » Chicago Hotels » Best Western Chicago

OpinionWell
Rank

46th

Out of 415

Best Western Chicago	Average Price: $237 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

125 West Ohio Street

Chicago, 60610 View map

2-Star Hotel Rank: 3 of 49
Average review rating: 3.64

OpinionWell Value Index: 5

Traveler reviews analyzed: Expedia (40) , MyTravelGuide (23) , Travelocity (21) , TripAdvisor (330) , YahooTravel (38)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (1/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

bar (42) bathroom (52) bed (77) bill (8) breakfast (87) charge (25) check in (36) check out (17) checkout (7) complimentary (13) concierge (9) cost (16) deal (21) deck (20) decor (9) discount (18) downtown (85) food (29) front desk (66) gym (7) hotel (610) housekeeping (7) lobby (52) location (244) manager (7) money (18) parking (320) patio (8) pillow (22) pool (148) price (88) rate (47) recommend (52) restaurant (144) room (505) room service (11) service (57) shower (29) staff (210) street (87) suite (56) to park (16) towel (14) tub (8) valet (6) value (50) view (40) walk (124) wireless (16) workout room (10)

Wireless

Appears in 16 comments.

71% wrote positive comments about wireless

The following words were used in comments with Wireless:
big (2) clean (4) comfortable (3) free (9) good (4) great (3) hotel (2) internet (4) location (3) nice (2)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. Pros:great location, very clean, comfortable bed, free in room wifi, cable, LCD TV, free parking with in and out privilegesCons:loud heaterno refrigerator.

"What a hotel room should be! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/20/2012 Vote

2. The free wifi does not work except for very early in the morning when few guests are on.

"Great hotel IF travelling with children or on a budget " Read full review on TripAdvisor 9/3/2011 Vote

3. Free wifi throughout as well.

"An oldy but goody! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 2/24/2011 Vote

4. Hope you have a wonderful time in Chicago and me and my companion really recommend the big Mc Donalds thats just right around the corner, just go easy on the good old big mac the wifie got heartburn but there is a pharmacy also just right around the corner you can see it outside the window its open 24 hours.

"pretty good except for several things " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/3/2010 Vote

5. Free wifi not the most stable but fair enough for a quick skype and browse.

"Just ok " Read full review on TripAdvisor 6/22/2009 Vote

6. The hotel is getting old, but clean paint in the hallways, nice room furnishing, huge TV, wifi, clean room with a nice comfortable bed and unit controlled heat all made for a comfortable.

"Great Service and attention by all - Love this location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/23/2009 Vote

7. The free wireless internet was a plus and the TV.

"Great location, and good value! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/24/2008 Vote

8. the good: free wireless internet, free parking and location.

"better value elsewhere " Read full review on YahooTravel 7/24/2007 Vote

9. Our WIFI service came and went, but that could be due to the fact that we were far from the office.

"Nice room, but noisy " Read full review on TripAdvisor 11/3/2011 Vote

10. Our only disappointment was the wifi.

"Great Value in a great location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 7/29/2011 Vote