Mayflower Park, Seattle, Tub

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » Washington » Seattle Destinations » Seattle Hotels » Mayflower Park

OpinionWell
Rank

18th

Out of 267

Mayflower Park	Average Price: $129 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

405 Olive Way

Seattle, 98101 View map

3-Star Hotel Rank: 5 of 72
Average review rating: 4.34

OpinionWell Value Index: 6

Traveler reviews analyzed: Expedia (62) , Priceline (36) , Travelocity (6) , TripAdvisor (572) , YahooTravel (13)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (1/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

amenity (19) bar (145) bath (20) bathroom (176) bed (98) breakfast (111) charge (21) check in (55) check out (20) closet (20) complimentary (18) concierge (52) cost (15) deal (18) decor (19) dinner (48) discount (9) downtown (208) food (84) front desk (90) hotel (1120) housekeeping (20) lake (10) lobby (69) location (467) lunch (18) manager (17) money (16) parking (33) pillow (18) price (76) rate (50) recommend (91) restaurant (239) room (843) room service (25) service (202) shower (38) staff (391) street (102) suite (71) towel (22) tub (16) valet (36) valet parking (43) value (44) view (91) walk (168) waterfront (29) wireless (27)

Tub	Appears in 16 comments. 50% wrote positive comments about tub

The following words were used in comments with Tub:
nice (2)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. After shopping all day we looked forward to coming back to the room, soaking in the deep tub and watching a movie but that was not an option.

"Get what you ask for... " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/29/2012 Vote

2. They bathrooms are also small and are probably a tight fit for larger people, but I love the deep tubs where you can actually take a nice soak.

"Great service and deep bathtubs " Read full review on TripAdvisor 10/24/2011 Vote

3. The bathroom sink was nice, but the tub looked a bit ancient and not really in a cute historical way.

"Good location, comfortable bed. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 10/14/2007 Vote

4. The bathroom was tight, with a modern shower head, but an old-fashoned tub and pedestal sink.

"Charming Step Back in Time " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/15/2012 Vote

5. I would comment however that there's no fan in the bathroom so the mirrors get foggy, and that the towel rack/bar is located @ the back of the tub/shower enclosure itself & there's only 2 hooks which are installed @ the top of the bathroom door, thus the towels get a bit damp after a shower.

"Can't beat their service & location! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 10/14/2011 Vote

6. The only towel rack is that one at the end, inside the tub high up, where they pile extra towels at times.

"Very Nice Hotel with a few Quirks " Read full review on TripAdvisor 7/19/2011 Vote

7. So if you use a hand towel near the sink, there is nowhere to hang it, you have to drape it over the edge of the tub or something.

"Very Nice Hotel with a few Quirks " Read full review on TripAdvisor 7/19/2011 Vote

8. We found a minor issue in the bathroom when we first arrived (just some hair in the tub and on a towe).

"We lucked out with Hotwire.ca " Read full review on TripAdvisor 6/14/2010 Vote

9. A tub, sink and camode with room to stand is all you get.

"Great location, Superior staff, Good hotel, lousy elevators " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/27/2010 Vote

10. We took a room with a shower, no tub.

"Great location for walking " Read full review 9/25/2009 Vote