Chapel Hill Holiday Inn, Chapel Hill, Bed

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » North Carolina » Chapel Hill Destinations » Chapel Hill Hotels » Chapel Hill Holiday Inn

OpinionWell
Rank

6th

Out of 26

Chapel Hill Holiday Inn	Average Price: $123 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

1301 North Fordham Boulevard

Chapel Hill, 27514 View map

3-Star Hotel Rank: 2 of 6
Average review rating: 3.28

OpinionWell Value Index: NA

Traveler reviews analyzed: YahooTravel (7) , Expedia (4) , TripAdvisor (77)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (0/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	No recent comments about noise were found.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

amenity (3) bar (15) bath (3) bathroom (15) bathtub (1) bed (11) bill (1) breakfast (7) charge (2) check in (17) check out (10) check-out (3) closet (5) complimentary (2) cost (3) deal (3) decor (4) discount (3) downtown (3) exterior (2) food (15) front desk (30) highway (2) hotel (98) housekeeping (2) laundry (1) lobby (18) location (26) maid (2) manager (3) money (3) parking (8) pillow (4) pool (19) price (10) rate (10) recommend (7) restaurant (15) room (146) service (17) shower (11) shuttle (15) staff (40) street (13) suite (4) to park (1) towel (6) value (2) walk (3) wireless (5)

Bed	Appears in 11 comments. 100% wrote positive comments about bed

The following words were used in comments with Bed:
bug (3) carpet (2) clean (4) comfortable (5) decent (2) fridge (2) iron (2) nice (3) pillow (2)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. The bed was decently comfortable, the bathroom was of adequate size, and the TV was decent enough.

"Not The Best Experience " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/16/2012 Vote

2. Huge King Size bed, 42 inch LG television, mini-fridge and microwave in the closet, along with an ironing board and iron.

"Mighty Fine for What It Is...Your Mileage May Vary " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/23/2012 Vote

3. I've read reviews about bad TV's and carpeting and such, well I must have gotten a renovated room because I had a nice LCD flat screen TV, carpet was OK, bathroom was above average, nice size fridge and a king bed.

"A very pleasant experience :) " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/6/2012 Vote

4. The size of the room was nice and the bed was comfortable.

"Smokiest Non-Smoking Room I've Been In! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 6/19/2011 Vote

5. The bed linens seemed clean and they had updated to the white bed set up, but the plethora of bugs (albeit harmless lady bug and a bunch of gnat-type bugs in the bathroom) counterbalanced it.

"Very Misleading Description- Sleepless Night! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/11/2011 Vote

6. The bed wasn`t too uncomfortable either, and they have a 'pillow menu' that allows you to choose what type of pillow you want.

"Would stay here again. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 11/18/2007 Vote

7. I have to say the bed was really clean and comfortable.

"Would Stay There Again " Read full review on TripAdvisor 9/18/2007 Vote

8. Fortunately, the room and bath were clean and the bed was comfortable.

"Old, old property w/minimal renovation " Read full review on TripAdvisor 7/18/2007 Vote

9. The room reeked of cigarette smoke, as did the bed, and the clothes I wore each night I was in the room smelled of smoke for days until they were finally washed.

"Not The Best Experience " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/16/2012 Vote

10. I am really picky about the bed I sleep in.

"Would Stay There Again " Read full review on TripAdvisor 9/18/2007 Vote