Radisson Orlando, Orlando, Noise

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » Florida » Orlando Destinations » Orlando Hotels » Radisson Orlando

OpinionWell
Rank

6th

Out of 543

Radisson Orlando	Average Price: $116 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

12799 Apopka Vineland Road

Orlando, 32836 View map

5-Star Hotel Rank: 3 of 21
Average review rating: 4.59

OpinionWell Value Index: 8

Traveler reviews analyzed: MyTravelGuide (18) , Travelocity (8) , TripAdvisor (946)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (2/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	There are recent comments about Construction.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

amenity (36) bar (140) bath (26) bathroom (177) bed (190) breakfast (218) charge (46) check in (126) check out (24) complimentary (35) cost (39) deal (90) decor (28) dinner (40) discount (47) downtown (199) fee (47) food (157) freeway (30) front desk (198) gym (28) highway (103) hot tub (48) hotel (2362) housekeeping (79) interstate (40) lake (115) lobby (159) location (497) manager (58) money (73) parking (217) pool (338) price (252) rate (116) recommend (187) restaurant (443) room (1603) room service (39) service (324) shower (64) shuttle (248) staff (607) street (59) suite (85) towel (78) value (140) view (57) walk (163) wireless (85)

Noise Traveler Insight - Noise Issues

Appears in 152 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Noise:
elevator (25) floor (11) freeway (8) highway (26) hotel (46) interstate (11) location (8) loud (9) much (7) nice (6) night (17) not (35) park (6) pool (9) problem (11) reviews (8) room (75) sleep (10) traffic (40) well (6)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. Quick check in and check out, excellent room service, no problems whatsoever, the beds were SO comfortable (they are sleep number beds), water pressure was great, no outside noises disturbing me, and also in a great location if you are there to go to any of the parks because it's not far.

"Great stay, would recommend it to anyone traveling for business or leisure " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/8/2012 Vote

2. As our room was at the rear of the building so we did not have any problem with road noise (I4 very close)The staff were excellent and very helpful.

"EXCELLENT HOTEL IN A GOOD LOCATION. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/3/2012 Vote

3. noise from any other rooms.

"EXCELLENT HOTEL IN A GOOD LOCATION. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/3/2012 Vote

4. The traffic noise was unbelievable.

"Not up to Radisson usual standard " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/24/2012 Vote

5. Some traffic noise if you are on the side of the hotel facing freeway.

"Good Quality Stay. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/12/2012 Vote

6. Internet good and two computers for use if no laptop/opod etcOnly one downside was traffic noise from 535 major road outside.

"Great Hotel- Nice Jaccuzi " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/6/2012 Vote

7. We didn't have to deal with alot of noise & the housekeeping staff were very polite & courteous.

"Very Happy From Beginning To End " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/29/2012 Vote

8. We could hear people speaking in corridor, but no noises were heard from other rooms or the highway.

"Great location! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/28/2012 Vote

9. Try to get a room away from highway noise if possible.

"Good " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/24/2012 Vote

10. Even though it's right off I-4, there was absolutely no road noise in our room.

"Top Quality---Great Value " Read full review on TripAdvisor 2/29/2012 Vote