Ramada New Orleans, New Orleans, Comfortable

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » Louisiana » New Orleans Destinations » New Orleans Hotels » Ramada New Orleans

OpinionWell
Rank

45th

Out of 427

Ramada New Orleans	Average Price: $189 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

541 Bourbon Street

New Orleans, 70130 View map

3-Star Hotel Rank: 24 of 125
Average review rating: 3.89

OpinionWell Value Index: 3

Traveler reviews analyzed: Expedia (96) , MyTravelGuide (17) , Travelocity (1) , TripAdvisor (377) , YahooTravel (35)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (2/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	There are recent comments about Construction.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

accommodating (8) adequate (9) attentive (7) awesome (19) beautiful (38) best (56) better (54) big (30) cares (25) cheaper (6) clean (172) comfortable (93) comfy (20) convenient (16) cool (9) decent (12) efficient (7) excellent (27) exceptional (25) fabulous (6) fantastic (18) free (35) fresh (13) friendly (158) fun (31) good (141) great (291) happy (22) helpful (121) huge (16) impressed (6) liked (81) love (38) new (181) nice (217) outstanding (5) perfect (74) perfectly (6) pleasant (20) pleased (9) plenty (10) professional (15) quiet (76) reasonable (19) reasonably (5) spacious (10) terrific (5) welcoming (11) well appointed (6) wonderful (49)

Comfortable

Appears in 108 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Comfortable:
bathroom (8) bed (60) clean (35) decorate (5) extremely (5) good (6) great (15) hotel (22) inn (4) location (9) most (9) new (6) nice (19) not (6) pillow (8) room (71) staff (11) super (5) walking (4) well (8)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. The beds were comfortable, and we requested a courtyard room to reduce the noise (no noise heard from outside).

"Great Location- Very Thin Walls " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/7/2012 Vote

2. Lovely room, comfortable beds, great view from the balcony.

"Will do again. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/16/2012 Vote

3. Extremely comfortable rooms and beds, and clean bathrooms.

"Good hotel in the epicenter of the French quarter New Orleans. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/3/2012 Vote

4. The rooms are really nice and the beds are super comfortable.

"Right in the middle of the nightlife on Bourbon Street " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/27/2012 Vote

5. Perfect location right on Bourbon street, old world luxury, comfortable rooms, we had a room overlooking the pool on the second floor with a balcony which was a nice surpirse for the price (we found the room at a great discount on the day with hotels.

"Best Location for Mardi Gras " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/11/2012 Vote

6. Rooms are spacious, nicely decorated, great comfortable bed and very clean.

"Wouldn't Stay Anywhere Else " Read full review on TripAdvisor 10/14/2011 Vote

7. The room was spacious and very comfortable.

"Great place to stay on Bourbon " Read full review on TripAdvisor 9/30/2011 Vote

8. Great location, great staff, nice clean room, comfortable beds, garden garden with a pool.

"2nd trip back and still loving the Inn on Bourbon " Read full review on TripAdvisor 8/25/2011 Vote

9. so comfortable.

"Stay here! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 8/23/2011 Vote

10. We had 3 nights here in June - I have to say that the hotels looks better in the photos than in real life, having said that it was clean and comfortable and the staff were helpful.

"It looks better in the photos!! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 7/29/2011 Vote