John Hancock Hotel and Conference Center, Boston, Liked

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » Massachusetts » Boston Destinations » Boston Hotels » John Hancock Hotel and Conference Center

OpinionWell
Rank

68th

Out of 197

John Hancock Hotel and Conference Center	Average Price: $182 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

40 Trinity Place

Boston, 02116 View map

2-Star Hotel Rank: 8 of 24
Average review rating: 3.41

OpinionWell Value Index: 4

Traveler reviews analyzed: BedBugRegistry (1) , Expedia (36) , MyTravelGuide (3) , Travelocity (4) , TripAdvisor (102) , YahooTravel (3)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (0/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	No recent comments about noise were found.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

acceptable (3) accommodating (2) adequate (5) affordable (6) amazing (2) beautiful (2) best (7) better (10) big (8) cares (3) cheaper (5) cheapest (4) classy (2) clean (75) comfortable (25) convenient (16) courteous (4) decent (7) enjoyable (2) excellent (17) fancy (4) fast (3) free (28) fresh (6) friendly (21) generous (2) good (70) great (46) helpful (43) huge (6) immaculate (2) liked (19) love (4) new (12) newer (4) nice (49) perfect (8) pleasant (7) plenty (2) positive (2) professional (3) quiet (15) reasonable (7) reasonably (2) soft (2) spacious (4) spectacular (3) tasteful (2) well appointed (2) wonderful (3)

Liked

Appears in 30 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Liked:
bathroom (3) bill (3) breakfast (3) clean (2) coffee (2) continental (3) convention (2) distance (2) hotel (5) lobby (3) location (3) need (4) new (2) not (2) old (2) room (11) small (5) well (2)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. Forget it if you like eggs or beans or something for a continental breakfast.

"Good for the location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/10/2012 Vote

2. If you don't like it, there is a Dunkin Donuts outside in the first floor or a Panera at a short distance.

"Excellent location, cheap hotel, needs an urgent renovation. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/30/2012 Vote

3. The bathroom was tiny and the tub needed an 'acrylic' paint job but otherwise it was clean and the sheets were soft and we slept like logs.

"It's NOT the Back Bay Hotel but you can NOT beat the location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/26/2012 Vote

4. The building is spectacular but it needs new carpeting and furniture and the lobby smells like mold.

"It's NOT the Back Bay Hotel but you can NOT beat the location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/26/2012 Vote

5. I like old hotels.

"Grim " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/21/2012 Vote

6. ?? Didnt like that, but there was a one cup coffee pot in the room.

"could use upgrade but nice " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/13/2012 Vote

7. The lobby and elevators look like they have been redone.

"could use upgrade but nice " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/13/2012 Vote

8. Cons: being a small hotel I would have like to see better maintained rooms.

"Older hotel, but good if you want just a place to sleep. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 2/24/2012 Vote

9. Staff was polite and knowledgable and I like that they have someone available 24 hrs if you need anything.

"Older hotel, but good if you want just a place to sleep. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 2/24/2012 Vote

10. The location is great, its within walking distance of pretty much any amenities you may need like food and transportation.

"Pretty Good and reasonably priced! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/15/2012 Vote