The Huntington Hotel & Nob Hill Spa, San Francisco, Accommodating

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » California » San Francisco Destinations » San Francisco Hotels » The Huntington Hotel & Nob Hill Spa

Back to search results

OpinionWell
Rank

44th

Out of 493

The Huntington Hotel & Nob Hill Spa	Average Price: $292 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

1075 California Street

San Francisco, 94108 View map

4-Star Hotel Rank: 23 of 37
Average review rating: 4.17

OpinionWell Value Index: 3

Traveler reviews analyzed: Expedia (29) , TripAdvisor (269) , YahooTravel (9)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (1/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

accommodating (7) attentive (11) beautiful (57) beautifully (7) best (57) better (25) big (75) cares (11) classy (8) clean (62) comfortable (64) convenient (16) delicious (9) efficient (15) elegant (19) enjoyable (9) excellent (53) exceptional (9) fabulous (18) fantastic (27) free (40) fresh (10) friendly (91) generous (11) good (86) gorgeous (10) great (221) helpful (75) huge (29) impressed (12) liked (75) love (68) luxurious (10) new (20) nice (145) outstanding (7) pamper (8) perfect (28) perfectly (8) pleasant (19) pleased (8) plenty (10) professional (13) quiet (27) reasonable (16) spacious (45) stunning (7) welcoming (22) well appointed (6) wonderful (59)

Accommodating

Appears in 11 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Accommodating:
bar (2) desk (3) excellent (2) facilities (2) friendly (4) location (2) pool (2) room (4) staff (7)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. The staff was wonderful and accommodating in every way.

"Great urban hotel " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/16/2012 Vote

2. I guess in hindsight he was trying to continue to be accommodating even though he was having a medical issue, but it would have probably been better to have left the concierge desk for a bit to pull himself together.

"Very nice hotel in a great location... " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/6/2012 Vote

3. The staff at the front desk were equally friendly and accommodating as was the bellboy who gave me a few helpful tips about the area.

"Pure class! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 9/30/2011 Vote

4. The staff was friendly and the accommodations were outstanding.

"Old World Flavor " Read full review on TripAdvisor 9/24/2011 Vote

5. The staff were friendly and very accommodating.

"A lovely hotel in San Francisco " Read full review on TripAdvisor 9/5/2011 Vote

6. I was very concerned our holiday was going to be spoiled by the wrong choice of accommodation.

"Old fashioned elegance " Read full review on TripAdvisor 8/11/2011 Vote

7. When i asked to switch rooms the next morning, the front desk was more then accommodating.

"Great views, one or two downsides " Read full review on TripAdvisor 8/2/2011 Vote

8. accommodation and facilities really are excellent - from location, pool, bar, restaurant, rooms and staff.

"Comfortable, good location, excellent " Read full review on TripAdvisor 11/4/2010 Vote

9. accommodation and facilities really are excellent - from location, pool, bar, restaurant, rooms and staff.

"Comfortable, good location, excellent " Read full review on TripAdvisor 11/4/2010 Vote

10. However, once you get onto the accommodation floors, carpets are off-colour and rooms far from luxurious whilst more than adequate.

"Faded 'old money' at the top of the city " Read full review on TripAdvisor 9/5/2009 Vote