WooGo Central Park - Tempo Apartments, New York City, Positive

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » New York » New York Destinations » New York Hotels » WooGo Central Park - Tempo Apartments

OpinionWell
Rank

234th

Out of 676

WooGo Central Park - Tempo Apartments	Average Price: $295 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

240 West 73rd Street

New York City, 10023 View map

2-Star Hotel Rank: 47 of 144
Average review rating: 3.93

OpinionWell Value Index: 3

Traveler reviews analyzed: Expedia (75) , TripAdvisor (86)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (1/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

acceptable (5) adequate (3) affordable (3) awesome (6) beautiful (6) best (7) better (15) big (12) cares (13) cheaper (3) clean (99) comfortable (34) convenient (29) cool (5) decent (6) excellent (5) exceptional (3) fancy (5) fantastic (3) free (10) fresh (5) friendly (40) fun (2) good (63) great (86) happy (4) helpful (26) huge (13) impressed (9) liked (58) love (8) luxurious (5) new (29) nice (47) perfect (14) perfectly (3) pleasant (2) plenty (6) positive (3) quiet (16) reasonable (7) reasonably (4) recommendation (2) responsive (2) secure (4) spacious (7) tasteful (2) terrific (3) welcoming (7) wonderful (7)

Positive

Appears in 3 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Positive:
location (3)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

1. The only positive was the location.

"Poorly run and certainly not 'serviced'. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 2/9/2011 Vote

2. The only positive was the location.

"Poorly run and certainly not 'serviced'. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 2/9/2011 Vote

3. The only positive thing is the location, that's all.

"Dissapointing! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 7/30/2009 Vote