Gramercy Park Hotel, New York City, Fabulous

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » New York » New York Destinations » New York Hotels » Gramercy Park Hotel

OpinionWell
Rank

66th

Out of 676

Gramercy Park Hotel	Average Price: $507 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

2 Lexington Avenue

New York City, 10010 View map

4-Star Hotel Rank: 28 of 106
Average review rating: 3.71

OpinionWell Value Index: 1

Traveler reviews analyzed: Expedia (24) , MyTravelGuide (7) , Travelocity (2) , TripAdvisor (361) , YahooTravel (10)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (0/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	No recent comments about noise were found.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

attentive (26) beautiful (95) beautifully (12) best (80) better (49) big (38) cares (21) clean (36) comfortable (73) comfy (13) convenient (24) cool (64) delicious (19) efficient (10) elegant (14) excellent (59) exceptional (19) fabulous (22) fantastic (45) free (16) friendly (85) fun (31) funky (13) good (152) gorgeous (23) great (282) helpful (94) huge (24) liked (152) love (98) luxurious (11) new (137) nice (142) outstanding (15) perfect (61) pleasant (15) plenty (12) plush (13) positive (13) professional (16) quiet (57) reasonable (16) responsive (12) spacious (31) stunning (11) stylish (16) tasteful (15) terrific (11) welcoming (21) wonderful (69)

Fabulous

Appears in 22 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Fabulous:
bar (2) beach (2) better (4) clean (2) comfortable (2) dark (2) floor (2) food (2) great (2) hotel (4) liked (3) love (2) much (4) nice (3) night (2) quiet (2) recommend (2) room (10) service (4) staff (2)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. The nice sized rooms in the hotel were clean and well stocked with lovely toiletries and a fabulous drinks cabinet.

"A Wedding to Remember " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/9/2012 Vote

2. What a fabulous choice.

"A Wedding to Remember " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/9/2012 Vote

3. My room over looked the park and the service was fabulous.

"Exceed my expectation... " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/1/2012 Vote

4. So when we arrived, we couldn't get in for the next night (it's SO popular as a regular dining outlet), but they did recommend a nice Italian round the corner (can't remember its name - but we had a fabulous night there).

"The best way to spend my 40th! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/16/2012 Vote

5. It is artfully decorated and just a beautiful, comfortable fabulous place to stay.

"Best Manhattan Getaway Ever " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/31/2012 Vote

6. The bars on the main floor are fabulous, but prefer The Bowery, and Crosby Street vibe.

"Come back Ian... " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/23/2012 Vote

7. This is like travelling across the world to stay at a Caribbean hotel with a fabulous private beach, only to be told on a day-by-day basis that the beach is off-limits to hotel guests during the day.

"Really disappointing stay in mid-December " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/4/2012 Vote

8. The hotel itself has fabulous large rooms which are quiet and bathrooms are spacious and products are good.

"Funky and happening " Read full review on TripAdvisor 12/31/2011 Vote

9. Exclusive design, clean and quiet rooms (we had a two-room suite), fabulous service.

"My favorite hotel in NYC " Read full review on TripAdvisor 11/15/2011 Vote

10. The furniture was fabulous with silk, tapestry and velvets.

"Form Over Function " Read full review on TripAdvisor 11/14/2011 Vote