Soho House New York, New York City, Spacious

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » New York » New York Destinations » New York Hotels » Soho House New York

OpinionWell
Rank

272nd

Out of 676

Soho House New York	Average Price: $712 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

29-35 9th Avenue

New York City, 10014 View map

4-Star Hotel Rank: 83 of 106
Average review rating: 4.09

OpinionWell Value Index: 1

Traveler reviews analyzed: Expedia (1) , TripAdvisor (81) , YahooTravel (1)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (1/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

accommodating (2) amazing (8) attentive (3) awesome (2) beautiful (6) best (15) better (13) big (7) brilliant (4) clean (2) comfortable (11) comfy (2) cool (12) coolest (3) cozy (2) decent (2) delicious (4) divine (2) enjoyable (2) excellent (16) exceptional (3) fabulous (5) fantastic (12) free (9) fresh (3) friendly (29) fun (10) good (25) great (62) happy (4) helpful (14) high end (2) huge (12) impeccable (4) impressed (2) liked (27) love (17) new (38) nice (10) perfect (6) positive (4) professional (2) reasonable (4) sophistication (2) spacious (10) stunning (4) stylish (3) superb (2) welcoming (4) wonderful (3)

Spacious

Appears in 13 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Spacious:
bath (2) bathroom (4) beauty (2) design (2) fantastic (2) floor (2) furniture (2) good (3) new (2) nice (2) room (16) smaller (2) style (2)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. spacious rooms with great bathrooms.

"Money, but value? " Read full review on TripAdvisor 9/17/2011 Vote

2. The rooms were fantastic, ultra spacious and absolutely nothing was missing.

"AMAZING HOTEL. SUPER ARTY. SUPER COOL. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 11/18/2010 Vote

3. The rooms were fantastic, ultra spacious and absolutely nothing was missing.

"AMAZING HOTEL. SUPER ARTY. SUPER COOL. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 11/18/2010 Vote

4. Yes, Soho House is brilliant it is so 'New York' you wont believe, the service was impeccable and the rooms were spacious and really individual, vintage furniture rubbed shoulders with the modern.

"Classy and so new yoik!! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/9/2009 Vote

5. good ,very spacious ,lots of nice features and furniture although starting to look a little tired .

"Great fun " Read full review on TripAdvisor 8/9/2008 Vote

6. Loved the huge ornate bed, chandelier, egg shaped bath, french-style wardrobe, the selection of goodies in the living area and spacious bathroom with full size Cowshed products.

"Mixed Feelings " Read full review on TripAdvisor 6/21/2008 Vote

7. Beginning with the positive;Rooms - we stayed in one of the Playhouse rooms which was beautiful and spacious.

"Mixed Feelings " Read full review on TripAdvisor 6/21/2008 Vote

8. We had a Playroom on the 4th floor - the second grade of room - and I thought that it was very spacious for NY and very good value at the price of $750 plus tax.

"Fabulous weekend break at SHNY " Read full review on TripAdvisor 10/15/2007 Vote

9. Our room (one of the smaller ones) was still quite spacious, though that`s partly because there`s no separate bathroom.

"Fabulous rooftop pool " Read full review on TripAdvisor 9/11/2007 Vote

10. The room booked was the playpen, one of the smaller rooms, but still very spacious nicely designed, well appointed and with some really good touches.

"Best Hotel Experience Ever " Read full review on TripAdvisor 9/4/2007 Vote