Wyndham Garden Hotel - Times Square South, New York City, Pleased

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » New York » New York Destinations » New York Hotels » Wyndham Garden Hotel - Times Square South

OpinionWell
Rank

19th

Out of 676

Wyndham Garden Hotel - Times Square South	Average Price: $341 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

341 WEST 36TH STREET NEW YORK

New York City, View map

3-Star Hotel Rank: 9 of 154
Average review rating: 4.18

OpinionWell Value Index: 5

Traveler reviews analyzed: Expedia (38) , Travelocity (7) , TripAdvisor (786) , YahooTravel (1)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (1/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

accommodating (18) adequate (27) awesome (29) beautiful (27) best (100) better (83) big (115) cares (29) clean (494) cleanliness (24) comfortable (317) comfy (50) convenient (97) courteous (30) cozy (23) decent (38) delicious (22) efficient (27) excellent (129) exceptional (34) fantastic (61) fast (23) free (198) fresh (41) friendly (378) good (474) great (586) happy (59) helpful (356) huge (35) immaculate (27) impressed (25) liked (150) love (91) new (386) nice (388) perfect (101) perfectly (24) pleasant (63) pleased (27) plenty (57) positive (22) professional (24) quiet (116) reasonable (59) reasonably (19) spacious (32) spotless (33) welcoming (73) wonderful (86)

Pleased

Appears in 43 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Pleased:
bed (2) big (2) breakfast (2) change (2) charged (2) complimentary (2) hotel (12) location (2) luggage (2) most (2) new (2) night (4) not (7) please (43) price (2) room (8) service (2) small (2) special (2) staff (2)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. It is not in a very esthetically pleasing part of town, but again, I didn't have any problems.

"Great Location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/16/2012 Vote

2. I don't mind taking the stairs, but those with luggage and tight schedules would not be pleased.

"Good value and central " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/5/2012 Vote

3. please remember that rooms in new york are SMALL that is a fact off life am afraid,if you wanta big room you will pay BIG dollers for it.

"hotel 36 IS NOW THE HILTON DOUBLETREE HOTEL !!!!! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 2/22/2012 Vote

4. We had a wonderful stay and found the hotel not only in a tremendous location but run by a young energetic, thoughtful and eager to please staff.

"great location, first rate service " Read full review on TripAdvisor 2/1/2012 Vote

5. We were very pleased that breakfast, morning newspaper and in room internet were all complimentary.

"Wonderful Stay in New York City " Read full review on TripAdvisor 12/15/2011 Vote

6. We were very pleased with our room.

"Beautiful rooms and friendly staff " Read full review on TripAdvisor 10/12/2011 Vote

7. Still, for a last minute Hotwire blind booking, I was quite pleased.

"Good for one night " Read full review on TripAdvisor 9/7/2011 Vote

8. We arrived 5 hours earlier than check-in time and were pleased to discover that our luggage could be secured (at no charge).

"Exceeded Our Expectations " Read full review on TripAdvisor 7/22/2011 Vote

9. please give my special regards to Cathy who each morning of my stay greeted me by name.

"SUPER STAY " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/31/2011 Vote

10. With that said, we were very pleased with this hotel.

"Very pleased with choosing the Wyndham. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/1/2011 Vote