Extended Stay Raleigh, Raleigh, Uncomfortable

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » North Carolina » Raleigh Destinations » Raleigh Hotels » Extended Stay Raleigh

OpinionWell
Rank

39th

Out of 119

Extended Stay Raleigh	Average Price: $65 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

911 Wake Towne Drive

Raleigh, 27609 View map

2-Star Hotel Rank: 17 of 41
Average review rating: 3.56

OpinionWell Value Index: 2

Traveler reviews analyzed: BedBugRegistry (1) , Expedia (13) , MyTravelGuide (103) , Travelocity (5) , TripAdvisor (14) , YahooTravel (1)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (0/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	No recent comments about noise were found.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

annoy (1) awful (1) bad (8) bare (2) bed bugs (1) broken (3) dated (1) difficult (1) dirty (1) disappoint (1) dump (1) expensive (1) hard (1) hardly (1) horrible (1) issue (2) loud (2) mistake (1) noise (5) odor (1) problem (1) rough (1) smell (12) stain (1) stale (1) terrible (1) uncomfortable (1) unsafe (1) worst (1) wrong (2)

Uncomfortable

Appears in 3 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Uncomfortable:
bed (3)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

1. The beds were the most uncomfortable we have ever slept on.

"Would not recommend! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/22/2010 Vote

2. The beds were very uncomfortable though.

Read full review on MyTravelGuide 6/3/2008 Vote

3. Bed was very uncomfortable.

Read full review on MyTravelGuide 3/27/2006 Vote