Banfield Motel, Portland, Poorly

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » Oregon » Portland Destinations » Portland Hotels » Banfield Motel

OpinionWell
Rank

108th

Out of 287

Banfield Motel	Average Price: $77 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

1525 NorthEast 37th Avenue

Portland, 97232 View map

2-Star Hotel Rank: 30 of 56
Average review rating: 2.64

OpinionWell Value Index: NA

Traveler reviews analyzed: Expedia (26) , MyTravelGuide (24) , TripAdvisor (10) , YahooTravel (1)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (0/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	No recent comments about noise were found.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

badly (1) barely (1) bed bugs (3) broken (1) complain (1) complaint (1) dirt (1) dirty (1) disgust (2) issue (1) mold (2) noisy (1) poorly (1) problem (6) sad (1) slow (1) smell (4) stain (2) troublesome (1) urine (2) weird (1) worn (1)

Poorly

Appears in 2 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Poorly:
shower (2)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

1. the room was poorly furnished (for example, the soap fixture in the shower had been ripped out of the wall and placed on the bathtub rim), the cleaning staff did not do an adequate job (there was hair in the shower drain and a candy wrapper on the floor).

"not impressed " Read full review on Expedia 3/17/2009 Vote

2. The sheets were so poorly made that the fitted corners pulled off the mattress both nights we were there.

Read full review on MyTravelGuide 3/28/2006 Vote