Austin Motel, Austin, Apologetic

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » Texas » Austin Destinations » Austin Hotels » Austin Motel

OpinionWell
Rank

52nd

Out of 287

Austin Motel	Average Daily Rate: NA Check Rates

Hotel Class:

1220 South Congress Street

Austin, 78704 View map

3-Star Hotel Rank: 28 of 77
Average review rating: 3.53

OpinionWell Value Index: NA

Traveler reviews analyzed: TripAdvisor (109) , YahooTravel (12)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (0/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	No recent comments about noise were found.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

annoy (2) apologetic (1) avoid (2) bad (5) badly (1) barely (1) bed bugs (5) big deal (1) bit dated (1) bug (2) complain (1) complaint (4) condescending (1) cramped (2) dated (2) dirty (3) disappoint (6) disgust (1) expensive (5) gross (3) hard (6) issue (3) lack (2) loud (4) negative (3) noise (5) noisy (5) odor (2) offensive (1) overpriced (3) poor (4) problem (7) rough (3) rude (4) sad (2) shame (3) smell (9) smelly (1) tear (1) terrible (3) threadbare (1) tiny (4) uncomfortable (5) unfortunate (2) unfriendly (1) unwelcoming (1) urine (2) weird (2) worn (4) worst (1)

Apologetic

Appears in 1 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Apologetic:

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

1. The front desk took just $15 off the rate and were not the least bit apologetic.

"Quirky, inexpensive, fun --- but not always " Read full review on TripAdvisor 7/26/2009 Vote