Union Square Plaza Hotel, San Francisco, Worn

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » California » San Francisco Destinations » San Francisco Hotels » Union Square Plaza Hotel

OpinionWell
Rank

151st

Out of 493

Union Square Plaza Hotel	Average Price: $79 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

432 Geary Street

San Francisco, 94102 View map

2-Star Hotel Rank: 40 of 119
Average review rating: 3.04

OpinionWell Value Index: 3

Traveler reviews analyzed: Expedia (46) , Travelocity (4) , TripAdvisor (123) , YahooTravel (7)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (1/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

avoid (4) awful (3) bad (8) bare (2) bed bugs (4) bit dated (2) broken (8) dangerous (2) dated (3) difficult (3) dingy (2) dirt (5) dirty (14) disappoint (4) disgust (3) dump (4) dusty (2) expensive (6) filthy (2) gross (4) hard (15) hassle (2) horrible (3) issue (5) loud (11) mess (2) mold (4) negative (2) noise (28) noisy (18) peeling (7) poor (3) poorly (2) problem (8) ridiculous (2) rough (2) scary (4) shabby (2) shock (2) slow (3) smell (11) terrible (3) threadbare (7) tiny (5) uncomfortable (2) unhelpful (2) unpleasant (2) urine (3) worn (10) worst (6)

Worn	Appears in 10 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Worn:
appearance (2) carpet (3) dirty (2) dusty (2) hotel (8) lighting (2) need (2) not (3) old (6) room (4) towel (3)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

1. I was too tired to move hotel so I settled for relocation to another room which was very worn and dusty (same with the first).

"Do not stay in this Bed Bugs infected hotel " Read full review on TripAdvisor 12/8/2011 Vote

2. worn out old towels, flickering lights when turned on, loud flushing toilet, tub dirty, shower not working properly, old worn out towels, etc.

"Not What I Expected!!! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 10/6/2011 Vote

3. Very worn appearance.

"Good as a cheap tourist hotel. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 9/2/2010 Vote

4. Very worn appearance.

"Good as a cheap tourist hotel. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 9/2/2010 Vote

5. I can deal with old but, it was dirty, the lights in the room flickered, it was dusty, the carpets were literally worn out with visible 'waves and folds' in them.

"Stay Away! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 11/1/2009 Vote

6. However, we were extremely disappointed with everything else about the hotel and would not recommend people to stay at this hotel for the following reasons:- The whole hotel is very old and in desperate need of refurbishment (carpets are worn out, radiators are falling apart, sheets and towels are so old)- The rooms are very basic and look very old.

"Good location - but not much else going for it... " Read full review on TripAdvisor 9/13/2009 Vote

7. If you are in San Francisco to be a traveller and see what the city- not just another hotel room- has to offer, look past the worn carpet and the walls that need a coat of paint.

"Exactly what we wanted....and expected!! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 10/20/2008 Vote

8. the hotel does look worn, but as i said for what we paid it was fine.

"GREAT LOCATION " Read full review on TripAdvisor 9/18/2008 Vote

9. HOTEL:The hotel itself is ridiculously worn out.

"If you are as clueless as I was and in "zeit not" " Read full review on TripAdvisor 6/25/2008 Vote

10. Creepy to see some worn-down looking people roaming the halls that might have lived there? A few of them looked homeless.

"Seedy but good location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 10/9/2006 Vote