Chicago Ramada, Chicago, Shock

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » Illinois » Chicago Destinations » Chicago Hotels » Chicago Ramada

OpinionWell
Rank

101st

Out of 415

Chicago Ramada	Average Price: $136 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

4900 South Lake Shore Drive

Chicago, 60615 View map

2-Star Hotel Rank: 18 of 49
Average review rating: 2.31

OpinionWell Value Index: 4

Traveler reviews analyzed: BedBugRegistry (5) , Expedia (37) , MyTravelGuide (32) , Travelocity (9) , TripAdvisor (118) , YahooTravel (23)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (0/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	No recent comments about noise were found.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

annoy (3) awful (3) bad (21) badly (2) barely (3) bed bugs (4) bit dated (2) broke (6) broken (14) bug (4) complain (5) complaint (4) damage (3) dated (6) difficult (2) dingy (6) dirty (15) disappoint (8) disturbing (2) expensive (7) filthy (4) hard (3) horrible (9) issue (5) lazy (3) loud (9) mold (4) negative (6) noise (14) noisy (6) outdated (9) overpriced (2) peeling (5) poor (6) poorly (3) problem (29) rude (10) shabby (3) shock (2) slow (3) smell (22) stained (2) tear (3) terrible (8) uncomfortable (5) unsafe (3) was a joke (2) worn (9) worst (8) wrong (5)

Shock

Appears in 2 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Shock:

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

1. When i saw the hotel and its room i was shocked .

"it was poor " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/2/2012 Vote

2. When we got there we were shocked.

"So Disappointing... " Read full review on TripAdvisor 7/18/2011 Vote