Roger Williams Hotel, New York City, Expensive

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » New York » New York Destinations » New York Hotels » Roger Williams Hotel

OpinionWell
Rank

121st

Out of 676

Roger Williams Hotel	Average Price: $393 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

131 Madison Avenue

New York City, 10016 View map

3-Star Hotel Rank: 40 of 154
Average review rating: 3.94

OpinionWell Value Index: 3

Traveler reviews analyzed: Expedia (41) , MyTravelGuide (3) , Travelocity (17) , TripAdvisor (455) , YahooTravel (17)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (1/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

a bit pricey (4) a bit small (6) annoy (5) avoid (4) awful (5) awkward (3) bad (23) bare (3) bed bugs (3) broken (4) claustrophobic (3) complain (20) complaint (9) cramped (8) difficult (6) dirty (4) disappoint (17) downside (6) expensive (23) hard (11) hardly (5) hate (7) hectic (4) horrible (5) inconvenient (4) issue (11) lack (5) loud (15) mad (3) negative (7) nightmare (3) noise (30) noisy (13) outrageous (3) overpriced (7) poor (5) pricey (7) problem (27) ridiculous (5) rude (5) slow (6) smell (5) terrible (6) tiny (36) too small (5) unacceptable (4) uncomfortable (7) unfortunate (8) unpleasant (3) wrong (6)

Expensive

Appears in 28 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Expensive:
$ (3) area (2) bar (3) breakfast (10) expense (28) fairly (3) good (3) helpful (2) hotel (11) much (2) need (3) not (4) pretty (2) room (7) service (2) small (4) useful (3) walking (2) water (2) well (2)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. The place was very clean and not too expensive with alot to do in the area or just a short walk.

"Nice find " Read full review on TripAdvisor 2/18/2012 Vote

2. The draw back if any is that the superior room, which is less expensive than the Deluxe, is small.

"Clean and Contemporary " Read full review on TripAdvisor 11/16/2011 Vote

3. Every room in NYC is too small and too expensive, but the Roger Williams does very well with what it's got.

"good location, good service " Read full review on TripAdvisor 9/12/2011 Vote

4. Overall we found the hotel okay, because a lot of alternative hotels in similar locations would have been either even more expensive or much worse quality.

"Okay, but not impressive " Read full review on TripAdvisor 6/13/2011 Vote

5. The bits and bobs you can buy from the room (selection in tub on mini-bar and in holder in bathroom as well as the mini-bar itself) are eye wateringly expensive ($6 for a not very big bottle of water placed on bedside table) but there is really no need to use them, there are so many places nearby where you can get whatever you need.

"Great location, decent sized rooms (for manhattan) " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/8/2011 Vote

6. Good but expensive breakfast.

"Very nice experience " Read full review on TripAdvisor 8/21/2010 Vote

7. This was ok, but expensive for what you get.

"Good hotel, but not special.. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/2/2010 Vote

8. were very expensive (we had our own, so it wasn't a problem).

"The Roger--A Great Value " Read full review on Travelocity 2/1/2010 Vote

9. expensive, but, what isn't in the City.

"Very Nice Stay " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/3/2010 Vote

10. I can concurr the breakfast is really expensive and the breakfast room is also the bar and it's pretty small.

"Beware UK Travelodge " Read full review on TripAdvisor 9/26/2009 Vote