Hotel Vintage Park - a Kimpton Hotel, Seattle, Smell

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » Washington » Seattle Destinations » Seattle Hotels » Hotel Vintage Park - a Kimpton Hotel

OpinionWell
Rank

19th

Out of 267

Hotel Vintage Park - a Kimpton Hotel	Average Price: $158 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

1100 Fifth Avenue

Seattle, 98101 View map

4-Star Hotel Rank: 11 of 20
Average review rating: 4.2

OpinionWell Value Index: 6

Traveler reviews analyzed: Expedia (80) , MyTravelGuide (319) , Priceline (361) , Travelocity (4) , TripAdvisor (450) , YahooTravel (9)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (2/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	Recent comments complained about parking fees.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

a bit pricey (3) a bit small (8) annoy (3) avoid (5) awful (3) bad (25) barely (9) big deal (11) claustrophobic (3) complain (6) complaint (22) cramped (9) dated (5) difficult (5) disappoint (34) downside (8) expensive (56) frustrated (4) hard (8) hassle (5) hate (5) issue (14) lack (7) loud (10) mistake (3) negative (12) noise (45) noisy (10) odor (5) outdated (4) outrageous (4) overpriced (7) poor (6) pricey (17) problem (19) ridiculous (5) rude (5) slow (5) smell (12) terrible (5) tiny (36) too small (6) uncomfortable (4) unfortunate (11) unfriendly (3) weird (3) worn (3) worst (3) would have liked (4) wrong (6)

Smell

Appears in 22 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Smell:
bathroom (2) clean (3) dog (4) friendly (2) hotel (3) housekeeping (2) liked (3) never (2) not (2) room (10) smoke (10) staff (3)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. It smelled good, but I didn't have time to stop.

"Good location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 2/28/2012 Vote

2. In responding to other reviewers, I noted no unusual smells, the fixtures (including lots of granite) were top notch.

"Love it! Great staff, great rooms, great locations. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 11/20/2011 Vote

3. There were a number of dogs but you would never know it - as we couldn't hear, smell or sense other dogs were there.

"High Quality Dog Friendly Downtown Hotel " Read full review on TripAdvisor 7/29/2011 Vote

4. The windows are appropriately nose height for my k9's, offering them a view and smell of the city.

"Best of the Best! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 7/18/2011 Vote

5. The animal print robes are fluffy and comfy (though mine was a bit too fluffy and had me lint-rollering afterwards), and the shampoo/conditioner/lotions were actually lovely smelling and really useable.

"Sweet Suite " Read full review on TripAdvisor 7/10/2011 Vote

6. The hotel is dog friendly and we met several new canine friends, but the hotel never smelled like dog.

"Wonderful boutique hotel in downtown Seattle " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/20/2011 Vote

7. However, it smelled of cleaning products.

"not bad, but not up to Kimpton standards " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/20/2010 Vote

8. Bathroom linens had a fresh scent too, not that hideous industrial smell.

"Wonderful bed. Wanted to take it home with me. " Read full review 1/6/2010 Vote

9. Our had a severe smoke smell the first day that would not go away.

"Our had a severe smoke smell the first day that would not go away. However, the hotel staff & management went above & beyond to " Read full review 6/3/2009 Vote

10. Service was lackluster, the bar closed early, and our room smelled like it had once been the scene of heavy smoking.

"The coffee was good in the morning, though there was little to eat. " Read full review 4/15/2009 Vote