Chicago Ramada, Chicago, Breakfast

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » Illinois » Chicago Destinations » Chicago Hotels » Chicago Ramada

OpinionWell
Rank

101st

Out of 415

Chicago Ramada	Average Price: $136 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

4900 South Lake Shore Drive

Chicago, 60615 View map

2-Star Hotel Rank: 18 of 49
Average review rating: 2.31

OpinionWell Value Index: 4

Traveler reviews analyzed: BedBugRegistry (5) , Expedia (37) , MyTravelGuide (32) , Travelocity (9) , TripAdvisor (118) , YahooTravel (23)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (0/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	No recent comments about noise were found.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

amenity (4) bar (3) bath (3) bathroom (23) bed (15) breakfast (22) check in (13) closet (3) complimentary (5) cost (8) deal (4) decor (5) dinner (3) discount (3) downtown (51) food (15) front desk (37) hotel (220) housekeeping (7) lake (48) lobby (25) location (53) manager (11) money (17) neighborhood (12) parking (45) pillow (10) pool (17) price (32) rate (13) recommend (14) refund (5) restaurant (35) room (263) room service (7) service (44) sheets (7) shower (16) shuttle (57) staff (66) street (8) suite (4) to park (2) towel (5) tub (5) value (2) view (22) walk (14) water pressure (3) wireless (12)

Breakfast

Appears in 22 comments.

80% wrote positive comments about breakfast

The following words were used in comments with Breakfast:
complimentary (3) continental (4) free (8) good (2) menu (3)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. Especially, we enjoyed the quality and quantity of complimentary breakfast that is been offered.

"Ramada Inn - Nice Plan to stay in reasonable price " Read full review on TripAdvisor 11/4/2011 Vote

2. Breakfast at the cafe next door was great.

"Very clean basic hotel room. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 8/13/2011 Vote

3. As a result of my complaining we were not charged for the meal and offered a complementary breakfast buffet.

"Not what I expected for a Ramada " Read full review on TripAdvisor 8/10/2011 Vote

4. The restaurant, The Lakeshore Cafe, has the best breakfast buffet I have ever had.

"What a Great Place to Stay! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/18/2011 Vote

5. 2) price was just over $100.3) Free parking available4) Offered free continental breakfast on websiteHowever I would nopt recommend it to anyone because:1) On checkin we were told that the smoking rooms we requested did not have wifi access so we had to stay in non smoking rooms.

"nothing special about this and too highly priced " Read full review on TripAdvisor 10/22/2010 Vote

6. 2) The free continental breakfast advertised on website was not offered because of some technical problem which we could not understand.

"nothing special about this and too highly priced " Read full review on TripAdvisor 10/22/2010 Vote

7. The treated all to a 5 a.m. free continental breakfast and allowed us a late checkout after the race.

"Great Marathon Hosts " Read full review on TripAdvisor 10/12/2009 Vote

8. Heck thrown in a free breakfast or something.

"Felt like I was taken " Read full review on YahooTravel 9/14/2009 Vote

9. The receptionist told where the cafe was, so I simply assumed that I could have complimentary breakfast there.

"Good if you only need a place to sleep " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/19/2009 Vote

10. You can have a good stay, but no hospitality and no breakfast included.

"Good if you only need a place to sleep " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/19/2009 Vote