Ramada Tucson, Tucson, Marvelous

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » Arizona » Tucson Destinations » Tucson Hotels » Ramada Tucson

OpinionWell
Rank

48th

Out of 278

Ramada Tucson	Average Price: $91 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

6944 East Tanque Verde Road

Tucson, 85715 View map

2-Star Hotel Rank: 11 of 58
Average review rating: 3.42

OpinionWell Value Index: 4

Traveler reviews analyzed: YahooTravel (12) , MyTravelGuide (22) , Travelocity (6) , Expedia (37) , TripAdvisor (65)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (1/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	No recent comments about noise were found.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	Recent comments complained about bed bugs.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

above average (2) attractive (3) beautiful (3) best (8) better (9) big (4) cares (6) cheaper (2) clean (42) cleanliness (3) comfortable (25) comfy (2) complementary (2) convenient (6) decent (5) efficient (2) enjoyable (3) excellent (3) exceptional (4) fast (2) free (18) fresh (4) friendly (23) fun (3) generous (2) good (50) great (26) happy (23) helpful (26) huge (2) impressed (2) liked (19) love (3) marvelous (1) new (2) nice (39) perfect (2) perfectly (2) pleasant (6) plenty (6) positive (5) professional (2) quiet (7) reasonable (5) reasonably (2) soft (4) spacious (5) spotless (2) welcoming (2) wonderful (6)

Marvelous

Appears in 1 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Marvelous:

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

1. marvellous.

"Excellent place to stay " Read full review on TripAdvisor 7/28/2007 Vote