The Sandman Inn, Santa Barbara, Big

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » California » Santa Barbara Destinations » Santa Barbara Hotels » The Sandman Inn

OpinionWell
Rank

14th

Out of 107

The Sandman Inn	Average Price: $130 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

3714 State Street

Santa Barbara, 93105 View map

2-Star Hotel Rank: 2 of 20
Average review rating: 3.48

OpinionWell Value Index: 5

Traveler reviews analyzed: BedBugRegistry (3) , Expedia (85) , Travelocity (4) , TripAdvisor (202) , YahooTravel (10)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (0/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	No recent comments about noise were found.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

above average (5) adequate (11) affordable (6) awesome (5) beautiful (16) beautifully (4) best (29) better (23) big (12) cheapest (4) clean (125) comfortable (56) comfy (10) convenient (16) courteous (4) decent (13) efficient (5) excellent (18) exceptional (6) fancy (7) fantastic (4) fast (4) free (86) fresh (10) friendly (48) generous (4) good (125) great (110) happy (6) helpful (33) huge (7) impressed (5) liked (54) love (20) new (18) nice (117) perfect (16) pleasant (18) pleased (7) plenty (10) positive (6) professional (5) quiet (31) reasonable (11) reasonably (8) soft (5) spacious (5) tasteful (6) welcoming (8) wonderful (7)

Big	Appears in 16 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Big:
bed (4) clean (6) comfortable (2) enjoy (2) free (3) fridge (2) great (2) hotel (4) internet (2) large (4) microwave (2) need (2) nice (2) not (2) offers (2) pool (3) price (3) reasonable (2) room (11) well (3)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. It had a nice pool and the rooms were big - all for a great price.

"Better than expected " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/4/2012 Vote

2. But what really impressed us were the two pools and big jacuzzi, and the sweetest little retro diner where a self-serve breakfast offered loads of choice.

"Wonderful facilities on a budget " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/22/2012 Vote

3. big comfortable bed.

"Good value. Clean. Quite dated. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/14/2012 Vote

4. We weren't expecting much because the price was so reasonable but the room turned out to be large, beautifully decorated and very modern (big flat screen tv, etc.

"Amazing value " Read full review on TripAdvisor 11/28/2011 Vote

5. Clean, not very big, no safe, but ok.

"Nice pool, friendly staff but noisy rooms " Read full review on TripAdvisor 9/6/2011 Vote

6. The rooms are not big for American standards, but the bed was good, room had wifi and it was clean.

"Pleasantly surprised " Read full review on TripAdvisor 7/17/2011 Vote

7. We stayed for a few days in June and found the accommodation quite OK, our poolside room was large and clean, well provided with free dvd, big flat screen tv, comfortable bed, fridge, microwave etc and well appointed bathroom (shower )with the usual goodies down to a disposable razor and vanity kit .

"good value " Read full review on TripAdvisor 6/23/2011 Vote

8. The breakfast was more that you could ask for it gave you a very big varity every morning.

"Very clean and close to down town " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/24/2011 Vote

9. BIG THUMBS DOWN.

"Extremely rude management " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/11/2011 Vote

10. Clean rooms, desks, great internet bandwidth, fridge, big microwave, new lcd tvs, A/C, nothing more needed.

"Excellent cost-benefit relationship. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/2/2011 Vote