Farmers Daughter Hotel, Los Angeles, Friendly

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » California » Los Angeles Destinations » Los Angeles Hotels » Farmers Daughter Hotel

OpinionWell
Rank

54th

Out of 700

Farmers Daughter Hotel	Average Price: $211 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

115 South Fairfax Avenue

Los Angeles, 90036 View map

3-Star Hotel Rank: 19 of 84
Average review rating: 3.92

OpinionWell Value Index: 3

Traveler reviews analyzed: BedBugRegistry (5) , Expedia (38) , MyTravelGuide (1) , TripAdvisor (394) , YahooTravel (34)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (1/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

accommodating (12) adequate (8) amazing (20) awesome (11) best (39) better (32) big (29) brilliant (7) cares (10) clean (134) comfortable (84) comfy (19) convenient (34) cool (33) decent (8) delicious (14) excellent (23) exceptional (10) fabulous (10) fancy (6) fantastic (23) free (36) fresh (23) friendly (135) fun (28) funky (14) good (147) great (277) happy (19) helpful (93) huge (10) impressed (8) liked (106) love (35) luxurious (15) new (15) nice (144) perfect (38) pleasant (26) pleased (7) plenty (12) positive (8) quiet (20) reasonable (35) reasonably (8) spacious (12) spotless (8) superb (6) welcoming (11) wonderful (28)

Friendly

Appears in 201 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Friendly:
clean (25) desk (10) good (13) great (25) helpful (52) hotel (51) liked (10) location (25) markets (10) nice (11) night (11) not (9) park (10) price (13) recommend (16) room (29) service (13) staff (121) super (10) valet (12)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. My daughter and a friend stayed here for the sole purpose of location.

"Awesom stay " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/10/2012 Vote

2. The service at the front desk, TART restaurant staff and cleaning staff was very nice and friendly.

"Good for its location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/4/2012 Vote

3. The first night we checked in around midnight and the staff was super friendly.

"Amazingly cute hotel!!! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/23/2012 Vote

4. I stayed here with a couple of friends for 2 nights.

"Amazingly cute hotel!!! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/23/2012 Vote

5. We had a two day stopover in LA earlier this month and found the hotel to be very well located, definitely worth staying at nice clean rooms, friendly staff and a nice chill out bar :).

"Excellent hotel close to farmers market " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/21/2012 Vote

6. So off-beat, so well located, so friendly.

"It used to be great. Now, maybe a "meh." " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/10/2012 Vote

7. The staff is always friendly and accommodating, the valet service is convenient, and the rooms are comfortable.

"3rd time's a charm " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/7/2012 Vote

8. They are friendly and accommodating.

"Enjoy our Stay and the people " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/28/2012 Vote

9. This hotel is unique in its styling, clean and offers very friendly service.

"Location, Location, Location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/8/2012 Vote

10. Good quiet rooms and the little extras in the foyer like the delicious cookies/ chips/cider/water made it feel very friendly and comfortable, After paying much more at various other hotels on our trip I considered it good value for LAWould definitely stay again.

"Quirky Clean & Convenient " Read full review on TripAdvisor 2/2/2012 Vote