Hooters Las Vegas, Las Vegas, Beautiful

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » Nevada » Las Vegas Destinations » Las Vegas Hotels » Hooters Las Vegas

OpinionWell
Rank

89th

Out of 481

Hooters Las Vegas	Average Price: $63 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

115 East Tropicana Avenue

Las Vegas, 89109 View map

3-Star Hotel Rank: 36 of 92
Average review rating: 3.24

OpinionWell Value Index: 4

Traveler reviews analyzed: BedBugRegistry (10) , Expedia (102) , MyTravelGuide (225) , Travelocity (84) , TripAdvisor (1034) , YahooTravel (94)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (2/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	Recent comments complained about room smell.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

acceptable (13) adequate (20) affordable (28) awesome (44) beautiful (31) best (130) better (154) big (116) brilliant (14) cares (58) cheaper (28) clean (565) cleanliness (17) comfortable (196) comfy (52) convenient (41) cool (40) decent (83) enjoyable (16) excellent (64) exceptional (35) fancy (45) fantastic (30) fast (27) free (274) fresh (21) friendly (362) fun (196) generous (18) good (595) great (668) happy (48) helpful (156) huge (54) liked (428) love (66) new (172) nice (428) perfect (45) pleasant (34) plenty (50) positive (19) quiet (40) reasonable (79) responsive (13) soft (20) spacious (38) tasteful (24) welcoming (23) wonderful (26)

Beautiful

Appears in 44 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Beautiful:
area (8) beauty (44) bed (4) clean (7) comfortable (3) good (3) great (9) hotel (3) liked (4) nice (5) night (5) not (3) pool (16) room (13) service (2) slept (2) smell (2) staff (5) swimming (3) walking (2)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. and it ain't to see beauties.

"...for the cost concious... " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/13/2012 Vote

2. the larger casinos have this covered and actually smell beautiful - probably due to automated smoke diffusers.

"Great location for The Strip " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/14/2012 Vote

3. Many beautiful women not just working there but staying there as well.

"Not tremendously great by Vegas Standards. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 10/5/2011 Vote

4. It's a nice place, with a beautiful swimming pool, very clean rooms and friendly/cute staff (the waiteresses are all gorgeous and smiley, it's a pleasure.

"Good cheap place in good location and beautiful swimming pool ! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 8/1/2011 Vote

5. there is a beautiful waterfall and three pools, depending on what temp you like.

"A great place to stay! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 7/25/2011 Vote

6. One night we stayed up until 6:00am at one of the bars drinking for free because the bartender (who was a beautiful Hooters girl) wanted some company to move the night along.

"Third stay at Hooters. You get what you expect from Hooters. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/23/2011 Vote

7. The waitresses are beautiful and aloof.

"If the shoe fits " Read full review on TripAdvisor 12/12/2010 Vote

8. We went to the pool everything was open and great, a beautiful water fall and pool towels were provided.

"I LOVED THE EXPERIENCE " Read full review on TripAdvisor 9/3/2010 Vote

9. It was beautiful, clean and the carpets were new.

"I LOVED THE EXPERIENCE " Read full review on TripAdvisor 9/3/2010 Vote

10. The girls are beautiful, and ALL of the dealers are friendly partly because they get to keep their own tips.

"Great value, Hooter's is a friendly, small casino. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/27/2010 Vote