Dana Hotel & Spa, Chicago, Attentive

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » Illinois » Chicago Destinations » Chicago Hotels » Dana Hotel & Spa

OpinionWell
Rank

5th

Out of 415

Dana Hotel & Spa	Average Price: $245 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

660 North State Street

Chicago, 60654 View map

3-Star Hotel Rank: 1 of 73
Average review rating: 4.68

OpinionWell Value Index: 8

Traveler reviews analyzed: BedBugRegistry (1) , Expedia (69) , Travelocity (24) , TripAdvisor (417) , YahooTravel (2)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (1/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

affordable (14) attentive (20) awesome (57) beautiful (57) best (73) better (55) big (40) cares (26) clean (101) comfortable (167) comfy (49) convenient (22) cool (58) cozy (27) decent (17) delicious (25) excellent (89) exceptional (30) fabulous (33) fantastic (61) free (77) fresh (20) friendly (214) fun (53) good (261) gorgeous (22) great (524) happy (20) helpful (165) huge (42) impressed (17) liked (179) love (53) magnificent (35) new (54) nice (262) outstanding (15) perfect (78) pleased (15) plenty (15) positive (14) professional (15) quiet (29) reasonable (39) reasonably (17) soft (22) spacious (31) spectacular (19) welcoming (33) wonderful (77)

Attentive

Appears in 27 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Attentive:
cares (2) charged (2) concierge (2) doorman (3) friendly (7) good (2) great (5) guest (2) helpful (2) hotel (5) lighting (2) need (4) night (3) not (2) pleasant (2) room (5) service (5) sleep (2) staff (15)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. And the light blocking shades still let a fair amount of light inGot a great group rate of 129/night or so, staff was friendly and attentive and the restaurant was really good, but I was there for a multi-day nonprofit board meeting and was thoroughly exhausted from not being able to sleep.

"Loud! Great place to stay if you like feeling like you are sleeping on the street! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/18/2012 Vote

2. The hotel also needs to pay a little more attention to detail and cleanliness in common areas.

"Almost, but not quite " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/11/2012 Vote

3. From the gorgeous design to the attention to detail, I couldn't have asked for anything more.

"Luxury and Location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 2/29/2012 Vote

4. Every employee we came across was attentive, courteous, and professionally -- yet somehow non-intrusive.

"Luxury and Location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 2/29/2012 Vote

5. The staff at Aja, including Matt & Mary and the whole morning team were attentive and friendly.

"Great staff !! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/8/2012 Vote

6. The staff was attentive and took care of their guests.

"Good, Comfortable stay " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/5/2012 Vote

7. The Dana gets the details right for a botique hotel - good linens, great bath products and an attentive staff.

"Dana gets the details right " Read full review on TripAdvisor 12/31/2011 Vote

8. attentive service, clean & sleek rooms, and convenient location.

"Great stay at the Dana! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 11/13/2011 Vote

9. Great hotel with very attentive service.

"Trendy Hotel Excellent Service " Read full review on TripAdvisor 10/25/2011 Vote

10. attentive staff made it an all around nice stay.

"Overall nice place to stay, unique rooms " Read full review on TripAdvisor 10/24/2011 Vote