Chicago South Loop Hotel, Chicago, Fancy

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » Illinois » Chicago Destinations » Chicago Hotels » Chicago South Loop Hotel

OpinionWell
Rank

38th

Out of 415

Chicago South Loop Hotel	Average Price: $168 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

11 West 26th Street

Chicago, 60616 View map

1-Star Hotel Rank: 1 of 4
Average review rating: 4

OpinionWell Value Index: 5

Traveler reviews analyzed: BedBugRegistry (3) , Expedia (29) , Travelocity (7) , TripAdvisor (414) , YahooTravel (1)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (1/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

accommodating (8) affordable (15) attentive (9) awesome (20) beautiful (12) best (48) better (33) big (51) cares (32) cheaper (11) clean (221) cleanliness (7) comfortable (89) convenient (43) courteous (17) decent (17) efficient (7) enjoyable (11) excellent (49) exceptional (16) fancy (8) fantastic (15) fast (8) free (204) friendly (157) fun (9) generous (10) good (164) great (259) happy (19) helpful (226) huge (37) impressed (16) liked (90) love (23) luxury (10) new (57) nice (186) perfect (19) pleasant (38) pleased (14) plenty (11) professional (32) quiet (36) reasonable (44) reasonably (9) secure (16) spacious (73) welcoming (19) wonderful (48)

Fancy

Appears in 8 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Fancy:
awesome (2) bakery (2) bar (2) breakfast (2) convenient (2) decorate (2) dining (2) downtown (2) floor (2) hotel (4) location (2) not (2) price (4) reasonable (2) sports (2) store (2) wine (2)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

1. Rooms were spacious and, while not fancy, were fine and comfortable.

"Good hotel - not a great location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 7/31/2011 Vote

2. There is no pool, no kitchenette or some of the other fancy amenities, but if you are looking for the basics at a good price with the atmosphere and pleasant staff of a higher-end hotel, this is the place for you.

"Reliable, convenient, clean and comfortable as always. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/2/2011 Vote

3. Simple decor, nothing fancy but reasonably priced, especially before and after the show.

"Great Value, Close to McCormick, and Good for Guests wanting to be close to Chinatown " Read full review on TripAdvisor 9/30/2010 Vote

4. Simple decor, nothing fancy but reasonably priced, especially before and after the show.

"Great Value, Close to McCormick, and Good for Guests wanting to be close to Chinatown " Read full review on TripAdvisor 9/30/2010 Vote

5. This hotel has an awesome sports bar (hamburgers fries type joint), a really fancy dining place (wine and steak), a breakfast/bakery place (eggs, sausage, pancakes), and a convenience store all located on the first floor.

"Best hotel for the best price!! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 9/6/2010 Vote

6. This hotel has an awesome sports bar (hamburgers fries type joint), a really fancy dining place (wine and steak), a breakfast/bakery place (eggs, sausage, pancakes), and a convenience store all located on the first floor.

"Best hotel for the best price!! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 9/6/2010 Vote

7. This is not a fancy downtown hotel, but for the price it is perfect for a Business Trip to Downtown Chicago.

"Exactly What We Needed " Read full review on TripAdvisor 12/3/2009 Vote

8. They're trying to be be fancy, but it falls a bit flat.

"Tries (kind of) hard, but not great " Read full review on TripAdvisor 8/10/2009 Vote