Embassy Suites Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Chipped

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » Ohio » Cincinnati Destinations » Cincinnati Hotels » Embassy Suites Cincinnati

OpinionWell
Rank

28th

Out of 150

Embassy Suites Cincinnati	Average Price: $153 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

4554 Lake Forest Drive

Cincinnati, 45242 View map

3-Star Hotel Rank: 11 of 28
Average review rating: 3.94

OpinionWell Value Index: 2

Traveler reviews analyzed: BedBugRegistry (4) , Expedia (16) , TripAdvisor (33) , YahooTravel (4)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (0/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	No recent comments about noise were found.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

a bit small (1) bed bugs (5) bugs (1) chipped (2) complaint (3) dated (2) difficult (1) disappoint (1) disgust (1) downside (1) exterminator (2) issue (5) mold (2) needs work (1) noise (1) noisy (4) overpriced (2) peeling (1) poor (1) problem (3) rude (1) slow (4) smelly (1)

Chipped

Appears in 2 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Chipped:
mold (2) tub (3)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

1. Some bathroom issues - mold in tub, very old shower head, large paint chip on door.

"Good stay " Read full review on TripAdvisor 6/30/2009 Vote

2. Signs of mold on the ceiling above the tub and along some of the baseboards, and paint chipping off of the tub and the toilet seat.

"Good value, good location, just a few minor problems " Read full review on TripAdvisor 6/14/2009 Vote