Home » United States » Nevada » Las Vegas Destinations » Las Vegas Hotels » Hampton Inn Las Vegas
Back to search results
OpinionWell
Rank
73rd
Out of 481

Hampton Inn Las Vegas

Average Price: $112  
 
Hotel Class:
4975 Dean Martin Drive
Las Vegas, 89118-1655 View map  
3-Star Hotel Rank: 26 of 92
Average review rating: 3.83
OpinionWell Value Index: 2
Traveler reviews analyzed: BedBugRegistry (3) , Expedia (24) , MyTravelGuide (51) , Travelocity (3) , TripAdvisor (236) , YahooTravel (7)
SAFE TO BOOK ? (0/5 issues found)
Skip Navigation Links
Keyword Cloud
The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.
Poor
Appears in 7 comments. 
The following words were used in comments with Poor:
maintenance (4)    
Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.
Sort by:
1. If you can find a deal, just beware of the poor maintenance, average-to-cool service, and abysmal breakfast selection.
"Decently remodeled rooms; poor service; horrid breakfast " Read full review on TripAdvisor   9/7/2009 Vote      
2. The poor maintenance extended to hallways, where the year-old "new" carpet looked like it hadn't been cleaned in five.
"Decently remodeled rooms; poor service; horrid breakfast " Read full review on TripAdvisor   9/7/2009 Vote      
3. Beware of the poor maintenance budget, however.
"Decently remodeled rooms; poor service; horrid breakfast " Read full review on TripAdvisor   9/7/2009 Vote      
4. We tended to overlook those who gave poor reviews - a mistake.
"Clean but less than what we expected " Read full review on TripAdvisor   11/8/2005 Vote      
5. Overall the hotel suffers from very bad maintenance or poor building construction.
"Worst Hotel ever! " Read full review on TripAdvisor   7/29/2005 Vote      
6. I wouldn`t recommend the buffets because the lines and waits are too long so poor to mediocre food.
"Great time - Inspite of the cool weather " Read full review on TripAdvisor   5/20/2005 Vote      
7. Location, not that it was poor, but closer to the strip would have been nice.
Read full review on MyTravelGuide   3/17/2005 Vote      
   
About Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Site Map
© 2010 OpinionWell, LLC, All Rights Reserved