Homewood Suites Austin, Austin, Broken

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » Texas » Austin Destinations » Austin Hotels » Homewood Suites Austin

OpinionWell
Rank

53rd

Out of 287

Homewood Suites Austin	Average Price: $158 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

10925 Stonelake Boulevard

Austin, 78759 View map

3-Star Hotel Rank: 29 of 77
Average review rating: 4.62

OpinionWell Value Index: 3

Traveler reviews analyzed: Expedia (5) , TripAdvisor (53) , YahooTravel (3)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (0/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	No recent comments about noise were found.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

apologetic (1) avoid (1) awkward (1) bad (1) broke (2) broken (2) chipped (1) complain (2) complaint (1) disappoint (2) disturbing (1) expensive (1) filthy (1) hard (5) hassle (1) horrible (2) issue (4) loud (1) mess (1) miserable (1) noise (4) odor (1) poor (1) problem (2) rock (1) rough (1) rude (1) slow (3) smell (2) smoker (2) stained (1) unfortunate (1) was a joke (1) worst (2) wrong (1)

Broken

Appears in 2 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Broken:
room (2)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

1. Several items in room broken.

"staying in austin " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/2/2012 Vote

2. My stay here was good as far as the room went, but my vehicle was broken into and my stereo and speakers were stolen.

"No Security or cameras, multiple thefts to vehicles " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/31/2008 Vote