Hotel Jerome, Aspen, Sick - Hotel Features

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » Colorado » Aspen Destinations » Aspen Hotels » Hotel Jerome

OpinionWell
Rank

1st

Out of 96

Hotel Jerome	Average Daily Rate: NA Check Rates

Hotel Class:

330 East Main Street

Aspen, 81611 View map

5-Star Hotel Rank: 1 of 13
Average review rating: 4.53

OpinionWell Value Index: NA

Traveler reviews analyzed: Expedia (25) , Travelocity (4) , TripAdvisor (112)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (0/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	No recent comments about noise were found.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

a bit pricey (1) annoyance (1) avoid (2) awful (2) bad (8) broken (1) chipped (2) complain (1) complaint (5) crappy (1) dated (4) depressing (1) difficult (1) dirty (3) disappoint (12) expensive (6) hard (2) hate (2) horrible (3) issue (2) lack (2) loud (4) miserable (2) negative (4) noise (2) noisy (2) poor (3) pretty small (2) problem (5) reluctantly (2) rough (1) rowdy (1) shock (1) sick (1) slow (2) snooty (1) stain (1) tacky (1) tear (2) terrible (2) tiny (1) unacceptable (1) unclean (1) uncomfortable (1) unfortunate (3) unhelpful (1) urine (1) weird (3) worn (1) wrong (3)

Sick	Appears in 1 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Sick:

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

1. What made my stay over the top is I had a horrible headache and was really sick one night.

"Best Pet Freindly Hotel Ever!!! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 2/9/2009 Vote