Aida Hotel San Francisco, San Francisco, Terrible

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » California » San Francisco Destinations » San Francisco Hotels » Aida Hotel San Francisco

OpinionWell
Rank

160th

Out of 493

Aida Hotel San Francisco	Average Price: $70 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

1087 Market Street

San Francisco, 94103 View map

0-Star Hotel Rank: 4 of 216
Average review rating: 2.14

OpinionWell Value Index: NA

Traveler reviews analyzed: BedBugRegistry (1) , TripAdvisor (52)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (1/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

annoy (1) avoid (2) bad (15) bed bugs (1) big problem (1) broke (2) broken (2) bugs (1) creaky (1) dangerous (1) dated (1) difficult (1) dingy (1) dirty (3) disturbing (2) expensive (3) fear (1) filthy (2) gross (1) hard (1) hassle (1) horrible (4) horror (1) insects (1) irritate (1) loud (1) mold (1) noise (5) noisy (3) overpriced (3) poor (1) pretty small (1) problem (7) rough (1) sadly (1) scary (4) shock (1) slow (1) smell (6) smelly (1) stain (2) terrible (5) tiny (1) unclean (1) uncomfortable (1) unhappy (1) unpleasant (1) worst (2) wrong (3)

Terrible

Appears in 5 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Terrible:
not (2)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

1. The location is quite good but you can find something much better than this terrible hotel.

"One of the worst places ever been " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/8/2012 Vote

2. Neighbourhood is terrible.

"No more next time " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/20/2011 Vote

3. it has character but currently its not of a terribly savoury kind.

"slightly seedy area, hotel has character but really needs a refurb " Read full review on TripAdvisor 11/1/2010 Vote

4. it has character but currently its not of a terribly savoury kind.

"slightly seedy area, hotel has character but really needs a refurb " Read full review on TripAdvisor 11/1/2010 Vote

5. It is terrible.

"Would have preffered Bates Hotel " Read full review on TripAdvisor 7/31/2008 Vote