Royal Pacific Motor Inn, San Francisco, Noise

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » California » San Francisco Destinations » San Francisco Hotels » Royal Pacific Motor Inn

OpinionWell
Rank

110th

Out of 493

Royal Pacific Motor Inn	Average Price: $105 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

661 Broadway

San Francisco, 94133 View map

2-Star Hotel Rank: 21 of 119
Average review rating: 3.73

OpinionWell Value Index: 1

Traveler reviews analyzed: TripAdvisor (83) , YahooTravel (23)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (0/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	No recent comments about noise were found.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

a bit high (1) avoid (2) awful (3) bad (10) bare (2) bed bugs (1) big deal (1) bit dated (1) broken (2) chaotic (1) complain (2) complaint (1) dated (6) difficult (1) dirty (6) disappoint (3) disgust (2) disturbing (1) downside (3) dusty (1) expensive (5) hard (13) hardly (2) issue (4) loud (8) negative (2) noise (22) noisy (24) outdated (2) poor (2) problem (7) rude (3) sad (1) shabby (4) sick (1) smell (15) smelly (1) stained (5) threadbare (1) tiny (2) unbearable (1) uncomfortable (2) unfortunate (1) unfriendly (1) unsafe (1) unsure (1) was a joke (2) worn (1) worst (2) wrong (2)

Noise

Appears in 25 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Noise:
bad (2) expectation (2) floor (2) high (2) hotel (2) inn (2) location (2) loud (2) much (2) nice (2) night (6) not (5) problem (2) room (6) street (8) traffic (3) view (2)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. The staff has no control over the noise outside of their property so they're not at fault.

"If you want to stay here take the good with the bad " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/30/2012 Vote

2. When the bars close there is a constant flow of revelers howling at the moon at the top of their lungs and the noise is almost unbearable.

"If you want to stay here take the good with the bad " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/30/2012 Vote

3. We got a fifth floor room at the back so had little to no street noise and had a bit of a view ( kinda nice actually).

"Ok... If you get it cheap. Clean and Central " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/4/2012 Vote

4. I had to leave the TV on to try to drown out the noise.

"Decent hotel, bad location for sleeping " Read full review on TripAdvisor 11/20/2011 Vote

5. Do try to get a room facing the back of the inn to avoid the traffic noise.

"Affordable and near Chinatown " Read full review on TripAdvisor 11/16/2011 Vote

6. What do you expect to pay for a hotel in San Francisco with this sort of location? This is not a flea bag; it's perfectly fine if your expections are modest and you can tolerate some nocturnal street noise.

"Downtown SF Location Hard to Beat " Read full review on TripAdvisor 11/15/2011 Vote

7. 'White noise' from the fan helped muffle the street sounds.

"Downtown SF Location Hard to Beat " Read full review on TripAdvisor 11/15/2011 Vote

8. We had a room at the back which seemed to be much quieter than our friends room at the front, and had no problem with street noise.

"cheap but clean " Read full review on TripAdvisor 11/15/2011 Vote

9. There was a little outside noise, but it is located the heart of a large city.

"Great stay for the price! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 9/20/2011 Vote

10. It is a motor inn and it has exterior hall ways so your door opens to the outside and the noise is kind of loud but didn't bother us too much.

"GOod value " Read full review on TripAdvisor 9/3/2011 Vote