Baldwin Hotel San Francisco, San Francisco, Mistake

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » California » San Francisco Destinations » San Francisco Hotels » Baldwin Hotel San Francisco

OpinionWell
Rank

35th

Out of 493

Baldwin Hotel San Francisco	Average Price: $130 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

321 Grant Avenue

San Francisco, 94108 View map

2-Star Hotel Rank: 2 of 119
Average review rating: 4

OpinionWell Value Index: 5

Traveler reviews analyzed: Expedia (48) , MyTravelGuide (31) , Travelocity (4) , TripAdvisor (490) , YahooTravel (10)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (1/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

a bit small (2) annoy (9) annoyance (2) avoid (7) awful (3) awkward (2) bad (21) bare (4) big deal (3) broken (2) complain (6) complaint (9) cramped (2) dated (10) depressing (3) difficult (9) dingy (3) dirty (3) disappoint (15) disturbing (3) downside (10) dump (3) expensive (15) hard (13) hardly (7) horrible (4) inconvenient (3) irritate (3) issue (22) lack (8) loud (21) mistake (2) negative (19) noise (120) noisy (57) odor (2) outdated (2) poor (2) problem (48) sick (2) slow (17) smell (18) stale (2) terrible (5) tiny (3) uncomfortable (5) unfortunate (5) unfriendly (3) worst (3) wrong (7)

Mistake

Appears in 2 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Mistake:
car (2) hotel (2) park (2)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

1. We had to then go back to the hotel, explain what had happened and were given a refund for their car park (maybe they need to explain in more detail where their car park is in future as we were told we weren't the first to make the mistake but it they are clearly losing revenue by doing this).

"Great hotel! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 9/15/2009 Vote

2. Make no mistake, this is an old-style, bare bones hotel with no extra amenities.

"Basic Hotel but Great Location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 6/21/2008 Vote