Bw Plus Pioneer Square Hotel, Seattle, Noisy

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » Washington » Seattle Destinations » Seattle Hotels » Bw Plus Pioneer Square Hotel

OpinionWell
Rank

26th

Out of 267

Bw Plus Pioneer Square Hotel	Average Price: $86 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

77 Yesler Way

Seattle, 98104-2530 View map

3-Star Hotel Rank: 10 of 72
Average review rating: 4.25

OpinionWell Value Index: 5

Traveler reviews analyzed: Expedia (2) , MyTravelGuide (4) , Priceline (27) , Travelocity (4) , TripAdvisor (336) , YahooTravel (5)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (1/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

a bit pricey (3) avoid (5) bad (17) bare (1) big deal (4) broken (1) chipped (4) claustrophobic (1) complain (3) complaint (7) crappy (1) dangerous (3) dated (2) difficult (1) disappoint (7) disturbing (3) downside (4) expensive (12) fear (2) grungy (3) hard (13) hassle (7) inconvenient (2) issue (12) lack (2) loud (5) lumpy (2) mediocre (3) negative (10) noise (37) noisy (15) odor (2) outdated (2) overcharged (4) poor (2) problem (17) rough (3) rude (3) slow (7) smell (6) stained (3) terrible (7) tiny (3) too small (2) ugly (2) unclean (1) uncomfortable (8) unfortunate (3) unsafe (4) worst (3)

Noisy

Appears in 14 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Noisy:
area (2) clean (2) highway (3) hotel (5) location (3) night (2) not (3) room (2) street (2) waterfront (2)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. The hotel was clean and quiet (thought the air conditioning in the bedroom was a bit noisy).

"Great experience! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/16/2012 Vote

2. The hotel is about a block away from an elevated highway, so it was a little noisy during the weekday mornings.

"Good hotel near Metro station " Read full review on TripAdvisor 9/18/2011 Vote

3. The only negative point I have is that the only heat source in the room was a very noisy window mounted fan.

"Pleasant stay " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/3/2011 Vote

4. Many exterior rooms face the Highway 99 Viaduct or the street, so they are probably a bit noisy.

"Excellent location, staff, and room quality for the price " Read full review on TripAdvisor 2/25/2011 Vote

5. Parking was charged $20/a night and very noisy during the night.

"Convenient location and beautiful decor. " Read full review 8/27/2010 Vote

6. Potentially noisy weekend nightlife via neighboring establishments.

"Historic, cozy atmosphere with outstanding complimentary breakfast. " Read full review 5/11/2010 Vote

7. Note: we were a one nighter but it did get noisy as we were over the bar and we didn't really get too bothered but it got noisy enough at 2 am to wake us up.

"One night before Alaskan Cruise " Read full review on TripAdvisor 8/22/2009 Vote

8. My only concern before arrival was that it is located almost adjacent to the raised highway that could have been noisy.

"Excellent vintage hotel in prime location for walking historic district, " Read full review on TripAdvisor 7/20/2009 Vote

9. noisy with the window open but it wasn't so hot that we needed to open it much.

"Good Value, Excellent Location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 7/12/2009 Vote

10. The location is great if you want to walk to Pike Market or along the waterfront, but the streets are very dirty and a large double-decker freeway is very nearby, so it is noisy outside.

"Good location, nice hotel " Read full review on TripAdvisor 6/22/2009 Vote