JW Marriott Hotel Buckhead Atlanta, Atlanta, Expensive

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » Georgia » Atlanta Destinations » Atlanta Hotels » JW Marriott Hotel Buckhead Atlanta

OpinionWell
Rank

21st

Out of 426

JW Marriott Hotel Buckhead Atlanta	Average Price: $314 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

3300 Lenox Road NorthEast

Atlanta, 30326 View map

4-Star Hotel Rank: 9 of 28
Average review rating: 4.51

OpinionWell Value Index: 2

Traveler reviews analyzed: BedBugRegistry (2) , Expedia (33) , MyTravelGuide (849) , Travelocity (6) , TripAdvisor (119) , YahooTravel (8)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (0/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	No recent comments about noise were found.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

a bit pricey (1) annoy (4) avoid (2) awkward (2) bad (4) bare (1) big deal (3) bit dated (2) broke (2) broken (3) complain (2) complaint (8) cramped (2) dated (7) difficult (3) disappoint (7) disturbing (2) errors (3) expensive (9) gross (2) hard (4) horrible (4) inconvenient (2) incorrect (2) issue (14) lack (4) mess (3) negative (3) noise (9) noisy (2) odor (2) outdated (6) outrageous (3) overpriced (4) poor (5) pricey (1) problem (13) ridiculous (3) shabby (1) shock (3) slow (4) smell (5) stale (2) tiny (1) uncomfortable (2) unfortunate (2) worn (2) worst (2) would have liked (1) wrong (3)

Expensive

Appears in 50 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Expensive:
breakfast (6) buffet (4) busy (4) comfortable (3) drink (4) expense (51) fee (3) food (3) friendly (3) hotel (9) internet (3) liked (3) not (3) offers (4) park (20) price (5) room (9) snacks (2) valet (2) wifi (2)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. I would give this five stars, but if not for the drastically reduced rate, the room is quite expensive, and there is no wifi in the room, you have to connect to wifi in the lobby.

"JW Marriott Buckhead for the win! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/29/2012 Vote

2. The breakfast buffet was nice and yummy, but way too expensive.

"Not at all what I expected! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/12/2012 Vote

3. My wife forgot her fancy air straightner/dryer thing in the room when leaving to return home, and apparantly these things are expensive.

"Really Great Customer Service " Read full review on TripAdvisor 2/23/2012 Vote

4. Stayed here for business, rooms very nice and comfortable, staff very helpful and friendly, my only complaint it seemed overpriced, I am not sure the pricing in Atlanta but it appeared expensive for what you get.

"Nice Hotel, however may be overpriced " Read full review on TripAdvisor 12/1/2011 Vote

5. It's 2011, even the least expensive hotels now have Wi-Fi.

"Not According to Its category " Read full review on TripAdvisor 7/28/2011 Vote

6. I booked cuz i love JW Mariott hotels- expensive, but worth every penny.

"This is an obviously OLD & WEATHRED property. Felt like a Holiday Inn. Fitness center was awful. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/8/2011 Vote

7. We decided to cut our losses, pay the very expensive check.

"Price does not meet expectations. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 2/15/2011 Vote

8. Buffet breakfast was expensive, but worth it.

"Showing its age - definitely not 4-star " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/23/2010 Vote

9. Parking is extra and expensive.

"Nice But Expensive " Read full review on Expedia 9/16/2009 Vote

10. The hostess at breakfast had a very bad attitude; expensive to use wireless internet.

Read full review on MyTravelGuide 6/12/2009 Vote