Outrigger Lae Nani, Kapaa, Worn

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » Hawaii » Kapaa Hotels » Outrigger Lae Nani

OpinionWell
Rank

10th

Out of 41

Outrigger Lae Nani	Average Price: $196 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

410 Papaloa Road

Kapaa, 96746 View map

3-Star Hotel Rank: 3 of 9
Average review rating: 4.34

OpinionWell Value Index: 2

Traveler reviews analyzed: Expedia (45) , Travelocity (4) , TripAdvisor (126) , YahooTravel (9)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (0/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	No recent comments about noise were found.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

avoid (3) awful (1) awkward (1) bad (8) badly (2) bare (1) big deal (3) broken (5) chipped (3) complain (6) complaint (4) dated (10) dirty (7) disappoint (11) disgust (2) disturbing (2) dump (2) expensive (5) hard (5) hassle (2) hate (2) ignored (2) issue (3) lack (2) loud (2) mildew (2) negative (3) noise (7) noisy (4) outdated (7) peeling (3) problem (9) roach (1) rock (8) rough (2) rude (2) scary (1) shock (3) smell (4) stained (4) tacky (1) terrible (1) tiny (2) unacceptable (1) unfortunate (4) unhappy (1) unpleasant (1) urine (1) worn (6) wrong (1)

Worn	Appears in 6 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Worn:
bed (2)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

1. but very worn out accommodations.

"Unit 436, worn out! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/31/2011 Vote

2. When we entered the condo I was dismayed to see that it was worn out and very dated.

"Beautiful location but avoid Unit 222 " Read full review on TripAdvisor 2/14/2011 Vote

3. Facilities and amenities are very outdated and worn, you could see rusted plumbing pipes in the bathroom.

"Could not wait to get out " Read full review on TripAdvisor 2/24/2010 Vote

4. The carpet , flooring, bedding and window coverings were quite worn.

"Beautiful grounds, but..... " Read full review on TripAdvisor 7/24/2009 Vote

5. Nicely furnished but a little worn and dated.

"Nice View!! " Read full review on Expedia 12/12/2007 Vote

6. We enjoyed our 7 night stay in unit 224, our only complaints were thelack of air conditioning, bed was a bit worn in, and the room could stand some updating.

"Great stay " Read full review on TripAdvisor 6/13/2007 Vote