Hilton Salt Lake City, Salt Lake City, Housekeeping

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » Utah » Salt Lake City Destinations » Salt Lake City Hotels » Hilton Salt Lake City

OpinionWell
Rank

3rd

Out of 192

Hilton Salt Lake City	Average Price: $199 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

255 South West Temple

Salt Lake City, 84101 View map

4-Star Hotel Rank: 2 of 7
Average review rating: 4.01

OpinionWell Value Index: 3

Traveler reviews analyzed: Expedia (61) , MyTravelGuide (256) , Travelocity (9) , TripAdvisor (346) , YahooTravel (17)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (0/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	No recent comments about noise were found.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

amenity (19) bar (25) bath (13) bathroom (45) bed (83) breakfast (158) charge (33) check in (42) cost (18) deal (18) decor (18) dinner (19) downtown (107) food (59) freeway (11) front desk (71) gym (26) hot tub (20) hotel (620) housekeeping (23) lake (111) lobby (62) location (148) manager (14) money (23) parking (99) pillow (26) pool (105) price (66) rate (47) recommend (36) restaurant (143) room (532) room service (29) service (128) shower (26) shuttle (22) spa (16) staff (218) street (24) suite (42) to park (9) towel (18) tub (17) valet (16) value (23) view (39) walk (62) whirlpool (13) wireless (32)

Housekeeping

Appears in 23 comments.

62% wrote positive comments about housekeeping

The following words were used in comments with Housekeeping:
clean (2) cleanliness (2) coffee (2) desk (5) disturbing (2) great (3) hotel (3) most (2)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. One recommendation is to request housekeeping to clean your room early as they get delayed if the hotel is full.

"Great Businessman's Hotel " Read full review on TripAdvisor 2/25/2012 Vote

2. The housekeeping service was great each day, even when we kept the 'do not disturb' sign up late into the morning.

"Clean in quiet in a great location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/6/2011 Vote

3. When we checked out we told the desk clerk: a far from pleasant, helpful or courteous man, about not having housekeeping the day before and were told that if we had our do not disturb sign out when housekeeping came by they don't stop by again (Are you kidding.

"Dissapointed and upset " Read full review on TripAdvisor 2/7/2011 Vote

4. Considerate staff, great breakfast, great housekeeping.

"Dissapointed and upset " Read full review on TripAdvisor 2/7/2011 Vote

5. We`ve been most pleased with housekeeping services and overall cleanliness.

"Nothing Special / Nothing Bad " Read full review on TripAdvisor 7/28/2008 Vote

6. We've been most pleased with housekeeping services and overall cleanliness.

"Nothing Special / Nothing Bad " Read full review on TripAdvisor 7/28/2008 Vote

7. Housekeeping failed us as well by not restocking coffee.

"Good bye old friend " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/7/2012 Vote

8. Very large & quiet suite that was immaculate and kept that way by the housekeeping staff.

"Fantastic 3-night stay @ HGI in SLC " Read full review on TripAdvisor 12/3/2011 Vote

9. We were especially pleased with the excellent level of service from all areas of the hotel (front desk, bell staff, housekeeping, and banquet staff) and the quality of the banquet food.

"Great service and an excellent location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 11/28/2011 Vote

10. Requested new pillows from housekeeping twice and the front desk twice - did nothing.

"Very nice. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 10/13/2011 Vote