Residence Inn Chicago, Chicago, Recommend

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » Illinois » Chicago Destinations » Chicago Hotels » Residence Inn Chicago

OpinionWell
Rank

78th

Out of 415

Residence Inn Chicago	Average Price: $258 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

201 East Walton Place

Chicago, 60611 View map

2-Star Hotel Rank: 8 of 49
Average review rating: 4.34

OpinionWell Value Index: 3

Traveler reviews analyzed: Expedia (30) , MyTravelGuide (612) , Travelocity (2) , TripAdvisor (194) , YahooTravel (6)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (0/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	No recent comments about noise were found.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

amenity (14) bar (13) bath (8) bathroom (48) beach (14) bed (52) bill (4) breakfast (173) charge (6) check in (20) check out (3) closet (10) complimentary (13) cost (7) deal (12) dinner (23) discount (5) downtown (38) food (31) front desk (38) gym (4) hotel (316) housekeeping (4) lake (33) lobby (21) location (141) manager (7) money (10) neighborhood (5) parking (21) pillow (8) pool (7) price (31) rate (17) recommend (19) restaurant (25) room (282) service (42) shower (27) staff (133) street (54) suite (88) towel (8) tub (13) valet (17) valet parking (8) value (15) view (31) walk (56) wireless (12)

Recommend

Appears in 19 comments.

100% wrote positive comments about recommend

The following words were used in comments with Recommend:
area (2) enjoy (2) good (2) great (2) high (7) hotel (6) not (5) street (2)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. I highly recommend this hotel.

"Great location, great room, great price! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/20/2012 Vote

2. Would recommend this hotel without any concerns.

"One word, awesome! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 2/25/2012 Vote

3. I'd highly recommend taking your business elsewhere.

"Gives Marriott a bad name.... " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/4/2012 Vote

4. Well , i looooooove this hotel, i went with my boyfriend for a couple of days in July it was awesome :) i mean our view was not the greatest because we had a horrible roof right next to the window but inside everything was lovely, we booked a junior suite that we really enjoyed ;) Ill recommend you that type of room, but try to request a high floor.

"Love the Beds :) " Read full review on TripAdvisor 12/20/2011 Vote

5. I would not recommend waiting for the two stations I noticed in the breakfast area (kids were playing games on them most of the time).

"A very convenient spot, great service, good breakfast! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 11/19/2011 Vote

6. I recommend choosing a high flooor facing the back to avoid the almost nonexistent street noise - you can open the window slides and enjoy a good nights rest without recycled aircon air.

"Super- what you sign up for you get, space comfort and a central location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 10/28/2011 Vote

7. I recommend Navy Pier, Museum of Contemporary Art, Water Tower Place, and Oak Street Beach.

"Great Location and Value! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 8/20/2011 Vote

8. For adults I recommend eating out at any great Chicago Restaurant.

"Great family Hotel " Read full review on TripAdvisor 6/24/2011 Vote

9. Highly recommend it for families visiting Chicago.

"Great family hotel " Read full review on TripAdvisor 10/8/2010 Vote

10. I'd recommend looking for public lots elsewhere if you plan to drive to Chicago.

"Excellent Hotel, would definitely go back! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 7/29/2010 Vote