Paramount Hotel New York, New York City, Staff

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » New York » New York Destinations » New York Hotels » Paramount Hotel New York

OpinionWell
Rank

98th

Out of 676

Paramount Hotel New York	Average Price: $318 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

235 W 46TH St

New York City, 10036 View map

3-Star Hotel Rank: 32 of 154
Average review rating: 2.88

OpinionWell Value Index: 3

Traveler reviews analyzed: BedBugRegistry (10) , Expedia (69) , MyTravelGuide (99) , TripAdvisor (1703) , YahooTravel (88)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (2/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	There are recent comments about Construction, Renovation.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

amenity (42) bar (293) bath (61) bathroom (436) bathtub (25) bed (600) bill (32) breakfast (210) charge (94) check in (186) check out (49) closet (80) complimentary (34) concierge (141) cost (78) deal (70) decor (98) dinner (39) fee (20) food (87) front desk (189) gym (24) hotel (2760) housekeeping (44) lobby (469) location (1009) manager (52) money (124) parking (31) pillow (53) price (309) rate (103) recommend (241) refund (20) restaurant (237) room (3440) room service (47) service (304) sheets (36) shower (211) staff (787) street (175) suite (54) towel (103) tub (37) value (81) view (130) walk (230) water pressure (23) wireless (98)

Staff

Appears in 787 comments.

88% wrote positive comments about staff

The following words were used in comments with Staff:
clean (89) concierge (41) desk (59) friendly (245) good (38) great (109) helpful (256) hotel (217) lobby (47) location (73) nice (59) night (31) rude (36) service (41) small (31)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. The staff was nice and the room was clean.

"Very Small Rooms " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/23/2012 Vote

2. Cleanliness was brilliant and the staff would help in anyway they could.

"Gorgeous Hotel ! Great Location! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/23/2012 Vote

3. The downstairs lounge was funky and staff very helpful.

"Funky hotel right next to Times Square " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/22/2012 Vote

4. All the staff were most helpful, courteous and friendly.

"perfect location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/21/2012 Vote

5. (The bedding was a bit odd, sheets but the duvet had no cover on it, I must admit I wasn't keen on the thought of how many bodies it had touched!)The staff were extremely friendly and we took advantage of the BOGOF offer on the cocktails on the first night.

"Excellent Location, Friendly Staff, Good value for money " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/21/2012 Vote

6. Staff are excellent, place smells fantastic.

"Quality, smells amazing! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/21/2012 Vote

7. The staff was awesome, the rooms were big and clean and if you wanted a lot of activity, there was a great bar downstairs with lots of music, and if you wanted something quieter, there was the Library bar on the second floor.

"Fun place in a great location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/17/2012 Vote

8. Lovely helpfull staff.

"Pleasant & great location! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/16/2012 Vote

9. )The staff was very pleasant and helpful and that was a real plus.

"Disappointing in some ways " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/15/2012 Vote

10. I would recommend this hotel as long as when booking you do not expect a large room but was clean, bed was comfy, staff excellant, and everything was close by.

"Wonderful " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/14/2012 Vote